92. Who has ever proved that people have souls? Nobody! That proves that the whole concept of soul does not exist! a. Ad misericordiam c. Ad Quoque b. Ad Hominem d. Ad Ignorantiam 93. He met an accident because it was Friday the 13th. a. False Cause c. Accident b. Petitio Principii d. None of the Above 94. You are killer! Since your father is also a killer! a. Appeal to ignorance c. Appeal to force b. Attack against Man d. Appeal to people 95. A person is innocent, unless proven guilty. a. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam b. Argumentum ad Hominem c. Argumentum ad Populo d. None of the Above 96. Identify what fallacy is being committed: You better think twice before giving that student a failing grade. Remember, he's the nephew of the university president. a. Argumentum ad baculum b. Argumentum ad hominem c. Argumentum ad misericordiam 97. Identify what fallacy is being committed: He is happy because he has no problems. And I know he has no problems because I always see him in a happy mood. a. False Cause b. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam c. Petitio principia What is the obverse of the following: 98. An artist is creative. a. An artist is not uncreative b. An artist is uncreative c. An artist is not creative. 99. Some medicines are not unclinically proven effectively. a. Some medicines are clinically proven not effective. b. Some medicines are clinically proven effective. c. Some medicines are clinically non-effective. 100. All ‘pedagogists’ are logically intelligent. a. All ‘pedagogists’ are not illogically intelligent. b. All ‘pedagogists’ are illogically intelligent. c. All ‘pedagogists’ are non-illogically intelligent.

The fallacy being committed in this statement is Ad Ignorantiam. The argument claims that because nobody has ever proven the existence of souls, it proves that the concept of soul does not exist.

The fallacy being committed in this statement is False Cause. The argument suggests that the accident happened because it was Friday the 13th, without providing any evidence or logical connection between the two.

The fallacy being committed in this statement is Attack against Man. The argument attacks the person by calling them a killer based on the fact that their father is also a killer, without addressing the actual argument or providing any evidence.

None of the above fallacies are being committed in this statement. It is a statement of the principle of "innocent until proven guilty," which is a legal concept and not a fallacy.

The fallacy being committed in this statement is Argumentum ad hominem. The argument suggests that the student should not be given a failing grade because he is the nephew of the university president, without addressing the student's actual performance or the criteria for grading.

The fallacy being committed in this statement is False Cause. The argument assumes that the person is happy because they have no problems, without considering other possible reasons for their happiness or providing any evidence.

The obverse of the statement "An artist is creative" is "An artist is not uncreative."

The obverse of the statement "Some medicines are not unclinically proven effectively" is "Some medicines are clinically proven effective."

The obverse of the statement "All 'pedagogists' are logically intelligent" is "All 'pedagogists' are not illogically intelligent."