In order for a writ of certiorari to be granted,*(A) a majority opinion must have no concurring opinions(B) there must be no dissenting opinion(C) four justices must support it being granted(D) at least five justices must be in agreement on the outcome of a cas
Question
In order for a writ of certiorari to be granted,*(A) a majority opinion must have no concurring opinions(B) there must be no dissenting opinion(C) four justices must support it being granted(D) at least five justices must be in agreement on the outcome of a cas
Solution
The correct answer is (C) four justices must support it being granted. A writ of certiorari is an order a higher court issues to review the decision and proceedings in a lower court and determine whether there were any irregularities. In the United States Supreme Court, at least four of the nine justices must agree to grant the writ for the case to be taken up by the Supreme Court. This is known as the "rule of four".
Similar Questions
The minimum number of justices required to vote in favor of granting certiorari to review a case is:Group of answer choices5423
For the 8,000 or so certiorari requests it receives each year, the Supreme Court’s rule to determine whether any given case is heard isGroup of answer choicesthe justices must unanimously favor hearing the casefive of the nine justices must favor hearing the casefour of the nine justices must favor hearing the caseat least one of the nine justices must favor hearing the case
When the Supreme Court denies certiorari, it means the Court:Group of answer choicesis supporting the lower court ruling.takes no official position on the case.finds the issue moot.believes the case lacks merit.
When the Court grants certiorari, it will:Group of answer choicesconsider hearing that case.hear and decide that case.officially end that term.allow the ruling of the lower court to stand.
Which of the following statements about opinion writing at the Supreme Court is true?Group of answer choicesThe majority and concurring opinions cannot differ in their legal justification for the decision reachedSupreme Court justices do not share their written opinions with each other to avoid groupthinkMembers issue few dissenting or concurring opinions because the caseload at the Supreme Court is so extensive that members spend most of their time writing majority opinionsBoth a unanimous decision and a 5–4 decision have the same legal force, if not the same power in establishing precedent
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.