Until the mid-to-late twentieth century, most services for people with disability were provided within institutions where they were grouped together and segregated from the rest of the population.What effect did this policy have on the perception of people with disability?Reinforced negative stereotypesEncouraged acceptance of people with disability within the communityEncouraged the idea that people with disability were less than human and dangerousReinforced image of people with disability as powerless and incapable.
Question
Until the mid-to-late twentieth century, most services for people with disability were provided within institutions where they were grouped together and segregated from the rest of the population.What effect did this policy have on the perception of people with disability?Reinforced negative stereotypesEncouraged acceptance of people with disability within the communityEncouraged the idea that people with disability were less than human and dangerousReinforced image of people with disability as powerless and incapable.
Solution
The policy of segregating people with disabilities in institutions until the mid-to-late twentieth century had several effects on the perception of these individuals.
-
Reinforced Negative Stereotypes: By isolating people with disabilities from the rest of the community, this policy reinforced negative stereotypes. It suggested that these individuals were different and needed to be separated, which could lead to misconceptions and prejudice.
-
Discouraged Acceptance: This policy did not encourage acceptance of people with disabilities within the community. Instead, it promoted the idea that they were separate and different, which could lead to exclusion and discrimination.
-
Dehumanization: The policy also encouraged the idea that people with disabilities were less than human and dangerous. This is a dehumanizing view that strips individuals of their dignity and worth.
-
Reinforced Powerlessness: By placing people with disabilities in institutions, this policy reinforced the image of these individuals as powerless and incapable. It suggested that they were not able to live independently or contribute to society, which is a harmful and inaccurate perception.
Similar Questions
How did society view and treat people with a disability in our history?
Which of the following are barriers to participation for people with disability. Stigma caused by stereotyping and negative mindsets of other people.Assistive technology to help people participateCommunication difficultiesAn inaccessible physical environment
What started to create a shift in society’s attitude towards people with disabilities in the 1920s?The addition of technology based servicesA training campaign that was sent through the mailVeterans from World War I and World War II returning home with physical disabilities and mental health impacts, who now required supportRadio shows about people with disabilities
Read this passage from "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut:He tried to think a little about the ballerinas. They weren't really very good—no better than anybody else would have been, anyway. They were burdened with sash-weights and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one, seeing a free and graceful gesture or a pretty face, would feel like something the cat drug in.Which statement best describes the overall impact of the setting?A.The emphasis on how people have been handicapped implies that society has gone to extremes to ensure equality.B.Witnessing something beautiful is compared to "something the cat drug in," which is a simile.C.The description of the ballerinas as average suggests that in the future everyone will be able to do what makes them happy.D.George's watching the ballerinas on television at home implies that society relies too heavily on technology.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Which event in the history of the Americans with Disabilities Act is an example of a conflict between different levels and branches of government?A.In 1990, the federal government spent more than $60 billion on disability benefits and programs.B.The act was reviewed by the House Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.C.After the Supreme Court restricted the number of people affected by the act, the National Council on Disability recommended that Congress revise the law to end the restrictions.D.Some disability experts believed that Social Security laws discouraged disabled people from working.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.