To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given line: "treated with the contempt which in critical circumstances it deserves."

1. **Understanding the phrase**: The phrase suggests that in critical or emergency situations, a certain principle or system is not respected or valued and is instead treated with disdain or contempt.

2. **Identifying the principle/system**: The context implies that the principle or system being referred to is democracy or the democratic principle of decision-making.

3. **Evaluating the options**:
- **Option A**: "The democratic principle of decision making is worthless in emergency situations" - This option suggests that democracy is not effective in emergencies, aligning with the idea of being treated with contempt in critical circumstances.
- **Option B**: "The system of democracy is useless in situations of crisis" - This option also aligns with the idea that democracy is not effective in crises, similar to Option A.
- **Option C**: "The democratic system should be abolished because of its inability to deal with crises" - This option goes a step further by suggesting abolition, which is a stronger stance than merely treating with contempt.
- **Option D**: "Emergencies cannot be handled in a democratic system" - This option implies an absolute inability to handle emergencies within a democratic system, which is a strong statement but not necessarily about contempt.

4. **Choosing the best fit**: The phrase "treated with the contempt" suggests a lack of respect or value in critical situations, rather than a call for abolition or an absolute statement of inability.

Therefore, the best answer is:
A. The democratic principle of decision making is worthless in emergency situations.

Question

To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given line: "treated with the contempt which in critical circumstances it deserves."

1. **Understanding the phrase**: The phrase suggests that in critical or emergency situations, a certain principle or system is not respected or valued and is instead treated with disdain or contempt.

2. **Identifying the principle/system**: The context implies that the principle or system being referred to is democracy or the democratic principle of decision-making.

3. **Evaluating the options**:
   - **Option A**: "The democratic principle of decision making is worthless in emergency situations" - This option suggests that democracy is not effective in emergencies, aligning with the idea of being treated with contempt in critical circumstances.
   - **Option B**: "The system of democracy is useless in situations of crisis" - This option also aligns with the idea that democracy is not effective in crises, similar to Option A.
   - **Option C**: "The democratic system should be abolished because of its inability to deal with crises" - This option goes a step further by suggesting abolition, which is a stronger stance than merely treating with contempt.
   - **Option D**: "Emergencies cannot be handled in a democratic system" - This option implies an absolute inability to handle emergencies within a democratic system, which is a strong statement but not necessarily about contempt.

4. **Choosing the best fit**: The phrase "treated with the contempt" suggests a lack of respect or value in critical situations, rather than a call for abolition or an absolute statement of inability.

Therefore, the best answer is:
A. The democratic principle of decision making is worthless in emergency situations.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given line: "treated with the contempt which in critical circumstances it deserves."

1. **Understanding the phrase**: The phrase suggests that in critical or emergency situations, a certain principle or system is not respected or valued and is instead treated with disdain or contempt.

2. **Identifying the principle/system**: The context implies that the principle or system being referred to is democracy or the democratic principle of decision-making.

3. **Evaluating the options**:
   - **Option A**: "The democratic principle of decision making is worthless in emergency situations" - This option suggests that democracy is not effective in emergencies, aligning with the idea of being treated with contempt in critical circumstances.
   - **Option B**: "The system of democracy is useless in situations of crisis" - This option also aligns with the idea that democracy is not effective in crises, similar to Option A.
   - **Option C**: "The democratic system should be abolished because of its inability to deal with crises" - This option goes a step further by suggesting abolition, which is a stronger stance than merely treating with contempt.
   - **Option D**: "Emergencies cannot be handled in a democratic system" - This option implies an absolute inability to handle emergencies within a democratic system, which is a strong statement but not necessarily about contempt.

4. **Choosing the best fit**: The phrase "treated with the contempt" suggests a lack of respect or value in critical situations, rather than a call for abolition or an absolute statement of inability.

Therefore, the best answer is:
A. The democratic principle of decision making is worthless in emergency situations.

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee