According to aesthetic supervenience, if two paintings are indistinguishable, then1 pointThey must have the same aesthetic valueThey have different supervenient propertiesThey need not have the same aesthetic valueThey must have different base properties

Which one is the core of an argument for the claim that aesthetic properties are not reducible to non-aesthetic properties?1 pointaesthetic properties are evaluativenon-aesthetic properties are descriptivenon-aesthetic properties are deductible from aesthetic propertiesaesthetic properties are not deductible from non-aesthetic properties

When we talk about the texture of a painting we meanGroup of answer choicesthe implied feel of the paint on the canvasthe compositional balance of colorthe way shape is used to create an imagehow perspective is achieved

The composition of any painting can be analyzed because any painting has to be Blank______.Multiple choice question.elaboratesurrealsimpleorganized

Select the correct answer.How has artist Joseph Kosuth raised questions about the nature of art in his composition One and Three Chairs? A. by showing three different representations of the same object, thus questioning the nature of representation B. by showing that the dictionary definition of an object, when presented as a work of art, can have the same effect on the viewer that the object has C. by showing that art can be of many forms and need not be only images or physical in nature

The importance of thinking carefully about the composition of individual paintings is particularly true of paintings thatMultiple choice question.do not portray political events.do not evoke an immediate response.do not have historically relevant subject matter.are not too intricate and complex.