Time left 0:08:20Question 6Answer savedMarked out of 1.00Flag questionQuestion textConsider the following claim and select from the options below ALL the options that could be used as premises to support the claim.The number of lung cancer diagnoses has decreased by 50% since smoking was banned over 10 years ago.Question 6Select one or more:a.The price of cigarettes have increased.b.The health authorities released a warning about smoking.c.W.H.O. has released the statistics of the many deaths caused by lung cancer in the number ofpeople that smoke.d.Smoking causes cancer.e.Smoking is hazardous to people's health.f.The smoking ban stopped people from smoking.g.Caffeine users have turned to pepsi as an alternative.
Question
Time left 0:08:20Question 6Answer savedMarked out of 1.00Flag questionQuestion textConsider the following claim and select from the options below ALL the options that could be used as premises to support the claim.The number of lung cancer diagnoses has decreased by 50% since smoking was banned over 10 years ago.Question 6Select one or more:a.The price of cigarettes have increased.b.The health authorities released a warning about smoking.c.W.H.O. has released the statistics of the many deaths caused by lung cancer in the number ofpeople that smoke.d.Smoking causes cancer.e.Smoking is hazardous to people's health.f.The smoking ban stopped people from smoking.g.Caffeine users have turned to pepsi as an alternative.
Solution
The options that could be used as premises to support the claim are:
d. Smoking causes cancer. e. Smoking is hazardous to people's health. f. The smoking ban stopped people from smoking.
Similar Questions
Abelson (1995) wanted to examine whether smoking led to lung cancer. He examined several studies, which showed the following results:The longer a person has smoked cigarettes, the greater their chance of getting cancer.People who stop smoking have lower cancer rates than people who keep smoking.Smokers’ cancers tend to be in the lungs and of a particular type.Smokers who use filtered cigarettes have a somewhat lower rate of cancer than those who use unfiltered cigarettes.People who live with smokers have higher rates of cancer, too, because of their passive exposure to the same chemicals.Identify the true and false statements about Abelson’s investigation.True Statement(s)The studies Abelson examined address all possible third-variable problems.Abelson would be able to make a strong causal claim if the studies he examined had the same findings.All of the studies that Abelson investigated were correlational studies.The simplest explanation of these results is that the chemicals in cigarettes cause cancer.False Statement(s)
Select all that applyWhat does cigarette smoking remain the leading cause of?Multiple select question.deathdisabilitypreventable diseasedementia
Which of the following is linked to the greatest number of cancer deaths?smokingfamily historypollutionUltraviolet radiation
Consider the claim Smoking is dangerous.Think about the limits and conditions that could apply to the claim and express it more cautiously (carefully).
The surgeon general has determined that smoking causes cancer and heart disease for both smokers and passive smokers, nonsmokers who breathe smoke-filled air. If cigarette prices are determined in a free market, which of the following will be true? aThe price of cigarettes will be too low and the quantity sold will be too high. bThe price of cigarettes will be efficient but the quantity sold will be too high. cThe market will be efficient because markets always equate marginal benefits and marginal costs. dThe price of cigarettes will reflect the marginal social benefit received by nonsmokers.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.