If a fire destroys 75% of the trees in a forest, this is an example of what type of limiting factor?
Question
If a fire destroys 75% of the trees in a forest, this is an example of what type of limiting factor?
Solution
This is an example of a density-independent limiting factor.
Here's the step-by-step explanation:
-
Limiting factors in ecology are conditions or resources that limit the growth, abundance, or distribution of an organism or a population of organisms in an ecosystem.
-
These limiting factors can be classified into two broad categories: density-dependent factors and density-independent factors.
-
Density-dependent factors are factors whose effects on the size or growth of the population vary with the population density. These are usually biological factors such as diseases, competition, and predation.
-
On the other hand, density-independent factors are factors that affect the population size regardless of the population density. These are typically physical or abiotic factors such as weather, natural disasters, and certain human activities.
-
In the given scenario, a fire destroying 75% of the trees in a forest is a limiting factor that affects the population of the trees regardless of their initial density. Therefore, it is an example of a density-independent limiting factor.
Similar Questions
discuss the causes extent and environmental impact of similpal forest fire 2021
Which of the following is an example of a limiting factor in an ecosystem?Group of answer choicesamount of logistic growthamount of exponential growthamount of biodiversityamount of available food
In the U.S., wildland firefighters are able to stop about 98% of all wildfires before the fires have burned even 100 acres. That may seem comforting, but decades of quickly suppressing fires has had unintended consequences.Fires are a natural part of many landscapes globally. When forests aren’t allowed to burn, they become more dense, and dead branches, leaves and other biomass accumulate, leaving more fuel for the next fire. This buildup leads to more extreme fires that are even harder to put out. That’s why land managers set controlled burns and thin forests to clear out the undergrowth.However, fuel accumulation isn’t the only consequence of fire suppression.Fire suppression also disproportionately reduces certain types of fire. In a new study, my colleagues and I show how this effect, known as the suppression bias, compounds the impacts of fuel accumulation and climate change.
what % of fires are deliberate?25% 48% 74% 92%
Which of the following is not a reason for the forest loss?Answer choicesSelect only one optionREVISITIncreasing use of woodExtinction of speciesExtensive use of fuel woodsMining and building dams
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.