Which of the following statements is TRUE about Abstract Data Types (ADTs) and interfaces? Group of answer choicesInterface in programming languages like Java is a kind of ADTADTs and interfaces are fundamentally the same, with no distinctive differencesADTs provide the implementation details of data structures, while interfaces only specify the type of operationsInterfaces can be instantiated directly, while ADTs cannot
Question
Which of the following statements is TRUE about Abstract Data Types (ADTs) and interfaces? Group of answer choicesInterface in programming languages like Java is a kind of ADTADTs and interfaces are fundamentally the same, with no distinctive differencesADTs provide the implementation details of data structures, while interfaces only specify the type of operationsInterfaces can be instantiated directly, while ADTs cannot
Solution
The statement that is TRUE about Abstract Data Types (ADTs) and interfaces is: "Interface in programming languages like Java is a kind of ADT".
This is because an interface in Java (or similar languages) defines a contract for what a class can do, without saying anything about how the class will do it. This is similar to an ADT, which defines the behavior that a data type should have, without specifying how that behavior will be implemented.
The other statements are not true. ADTs and interfaces are not fundamentally the same, as ADTs are a high-level description of behavior, while interfaces are a code-level contract. ADTs do not provide implementation details of data structures, they only specify what operations are to be performed but not how these operations will be implemented. Interfaces cannot be instantiated directly, they can only be implemented by classes or extended by other interfaces.
Similar Questions
What is an Abstract Data Type (ADT) in the context of data structures?a)A way to represent data in a physical memory location.b)A specific implementation of a data structure.c)A programming language feature for creating arrays.d)A high-level description of a set of operations on data without specifying the implementation.
Which of the following statements about interfaces in Java is correct? Select one: The methods specified in the interface have a body enclosed by curly brackets. They are defined with the keyword "interface." The syntax is similar to that of a class, with the difference that no methods are abstract. They are defined with the keyword "abstract."
Which statements are true for both abstract classes and interfaces? (Choose all that apply *4 pointsA. All methods within them are assumed to be abstract.B. Both can contain public static final variables.C. Both can be extended using the extend keyword.D. Both can contain default methods.E. Both can contain static methods.F. Neither can be instantiated directly.G. Both inherit java.lang.Object.
Select the correct statements on differences of abstract classes and interfacesSelect one or more:interface is better suited for Type declaration and abstract class is more suited for code reuse and evolution perspective.you can extend only one abstract classyou can create a non-abstract method in abstract classyou can implement multiple inheritance in Java.you can create a non-abstract method in an interface
What are differences among Interface, Abstract Class and Class? Hints: Use case Syntax and code example
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.