As Thomas Hobbes notes, morality is developed to help us not fall into the ‘state of nature.’ Such a state, he says, would be nasty, brutish, and short. One reason- one reason he specifically mentions- that we might fall into such a state, is that....Group of answer choicesWhen there is enough scarcity to make everyone have unmet needs, people will be inclined to break with such rulesGovernments break down, and wars happen. In such circumstances, no one has any reason to observe moral rules. So, they do not do so.Just as Rousseau says, the state of can happen for an almost infinite number of reasons. And this would make us like ‘noble savages,' as he puts it.Like tigers, all are all really aggressive beings
Question
As Thomas Hobbes notes, morality is developed to help us not fall into the ‘state of nature.’ Such a state, he says, would be nasty, brutish, and short. One reason- one reason he specifically mentions- that we might fall into such a state, is that....Group of answer choicesWhen there is enough scarcity to make everyone have unmet needs, people will be inclined to break with such rulesGovernments break down, and wars happen. In such circumstances, no one has any reason to observe moral rules. So, they do not do so.Just as Rousseau says, the state of can happen for an almost infinite number of reasons. And this would make us like ‘noble savages,' as he puts it.Like tigers, all are all really aggressive beings
Solution
Thomas Hobbes, in his philosophical works, posits that morality is a construct developed to prevent us from descending into a 'state of nature'. According to Hobbes, such a state would be characterized by brutality, nastiness, and brevity. He specifically mentions that there are several reasons why we might fall into such a state.
One such reason is the occurrence of scarcity to the extent that everyone has unmet needs. In such a situation, people might be inclined to disregard moral rules in order to fulfill their needs.
Another reason is the breakdown of governments and the occurrence of wars. In such circumstances, there is no incentive for individuals to observe moral rules, leading to a disregard for such rules.
Hobbes' views contrast with those of Rousseau, who suggests that the state of nature can occur due to an almost infinite number of reasons, which would make us akin to 'noble savages'.
Lastly, Hobbes suggests that like tigers, all humans are inherently aggressive beings. This inherent aggression could potentially lead to a breakdown of moral rules and a descent into the state of nature.
Similar Questions
Morality is concerned with the results of wrong action, when done.a.Agreeb.Disagreec.Slightly disagreed.I don't knowe.Not at all
To what extent should laws reflect moral values, and when, if ever, is it justifiable for individuals to disobey laws based on moral grounds?
constitutional morality prevails over social morality
Question 4Some people say that all ethics are relative – that what is morally permissible depends on who you ask. Many assumptions behind this idea, called Moral Relativism, are false. Which assumption may be true: 1 pointEach of us belongs to only one groupLearning and social progress is not possible Our choices affect only ourselvesPeople in power always have the “correct” valuesValues diverge across the world
Discuss the nature of morality.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.