Findlay (2008) found, jurors are more likely to be swayed by _________ despite directions from a judge.Question 18Select one:Witness testimonyTraditional policing evidenceExpert testimonyDNA evidence
Question
Findlay (2008) found, jurors are more likely to be swayed by _________ despite directions from a judge.Question 18Select one:Witness testimonyTraditional policing evidenceExpert testimonyDNA evidence
Solution
To answer the question, we need to determine which type of evidence Findlay (2008) found to be most influential on jurors, even when they receive directions from a judge. Let's analyze each option:
- Witness testimony: This refers to statements given by individuals who have observed events related to the case.
- Traditional policing evidence: This includes evidence collected through standard police procedures, such as physical evidence, surveillance footage, or police reports.
- Expert testimony: This involves statements given by individuals with specialized knowledge or expertise relevant to the case.
- DNA evidence: This is biological evidence that can be used to identify individuals based on their unique genetic makeup.
Findlay (2008) specifically found that jurors are more likely to be swayed by expert testimony despite directions from a judge. Expert testimony often carries significant weight because it comes from individuals who are perceived to have specialized knowledge and credibility.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
Expert testimony
Similar Questions
Which of the following variables moderates the influence of expert testimony:Group of answer choicesExpert testimony that is concretely linked to trial evidence is more influential than testimony that leaves the link implicitExpert testimony based on clinical judgment is more influential than is testimony based on actuarial predictiontestimony that presents a qualitative description of the degree to which two forensic samples match is more persuasive than testimony that presents the match in quantitative termsall of the abovenone of the above
Twelve jurors are given the facts of a case, and they spend several hours carefully weighing the evidence, discussing opposing views, and then each vote on whether a person is guilty or not. This verdict is an example of what?Question 8Select one:a.peer pressureb.groupthinkc.consensusd.nullificati
Who has the burden of proof regarding criminal conduct?Group of answer choicesthe prosecutionthe witnessesthe judgethe victim
4. Would you be more likely to believe the testimony of a police officer or authority figure over the testimony of a normal citizen? Why or why not? If you were listening to a testimony from two different people what factors might make you trust one person's story over the other?
What role do forensic scientists not offer in the courtroom process?Question 8Select one:Expert witness Support in the preparation and presentation of evidence to the courtA direct point of contact for jurors who may have questions about the forensic evidence being presentedDevelopment of legislation to ensure that police adhere to appropriate processes and techniques
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.