Most of the research on poverty in the United States has involved cross-sectional analyses of absolute poverty. Researchers were interested in examining whether poverty varies across the lifespan. To do so, they used data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a nationally representative sample of non-immigrant household income from 6,000 American families and their descendants since 1968. Researchers used a relative measure of poverty, defined as being in the bottom 20% of the income distribution for that year. Extreme poverty was defined as being in the bottom 10% of the income distribution. The data are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1 Cumulative percentage of Americans who have experienced at least one year of poverty or extreme poverty by ageNext, researchers wanted to know whether certain age groups were more prone to experiencing poverty than others. They separated individuals into different age categories and calculated the percent of individuals in each category who had experienced at least one year of poverty or extreme poverty during those years. They presented that data in Table 1.Table 1 Age groups within which Americans experienced at least one year of poverty or extreme poverty; data reported as mean (std. dev.)Lastly, the researchers used logistic regression to identify different factors that increase the likelihood of an American experiencing poverty during their life. They expressed each factor as an odds ratio. The greater the odds ratio, the more likely it is that someone falling into that category (for example, having less than 12 years of education) will experience poverty than someone who doesn’t fall into that category (for example, having 12 or more years of education). The researchers adjusted for collinearity.Table 2 Odds ratios predicting the occurrence of poverty between the ages of 25 and 60; all variables were found to be statistically significant at the p < 0.01 levelAdapted from Rank MR, Hirschl TA (2015) The Likelihood of Experiencing Relative Poverty over the Life Course. PLOS ONE 10(7): e0133513 under CCBY Question 14A follow-up study finds that first-generation immigrants between the ages of 25 and 34 are more likely than the participants in this study to experience poverty. However, second-generation immigrants aged 25-34 experience poverty at the same rate as the study participants. This finding would best serve as societal evidence of: A.intragenerational mobility.B.intergenerational mobility.C.social reproduction.D.meritocracy.
Question
Most of the research on poverty in the United States has involved cross-sectional analyses of absolute poverty. Researchers were interested in examining whether poverty varies across the lifespan. To do so, they used data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a nationally representative sample of non-immigrant household income from 6,000 American families and their descendants since 1968. Researchers used a relative measure of poverty, defined as being in the bottom 20% of the income distribution for that year. Extreme poverty was defined as being in the bottom 10% of the income distribution. The data are shown in Figure 1.Figure 1 Cumulative percentage of Americans who have experienced at least one year of poverty or extreme poverty by ageNext, researchers wanted to know whether certain age groups were more prone to experiencing poverty than others. They separated individuals into different age categories and calculated the percent of individuals in each category who had experienced at least one year of poverty or extreme poverty during those years. They presented that data in Table 1.Table 1 Age groups within which Americans experienced at least one year of poverty or extreme poverty; data reported as mean (std. dev.)Lastly, the researchers used logistic regression to identify different factors that increase the likelihood of an American experiencing poverty during their life. They expressed each factor as an odds ratio. The greater the odds ratio, the more likely it is that someone falling into that category (for example, having less than 12 years of education) will experience poverty than someone who doesn’t fall into that category (for example, having 12 or more years of education). The researchers adjusted for collinearity.Table 2 Odds ratios predicting the occurrence of poverty between the ages of 25 and 60; all variables were found to be statistically significant at the p < 0.01 levelAdapted from Rank MR, Hirschl TA (2015) The Likelihood of Experiencing Relative Poverty over the Life Course. PLOS ONE 10(7): e0133513 under CCBY Question 14A follow-up study finds that first-generation immigrants between the ages of 25 and 34 are more likely than the participants in this study to experience poverty. However, second-generation immigrants aged 25-34 experience poverty at the same rate as the study participants. This finding would best serve as societal evidence of: A.intragenerational mobility.B.intergenerational mobility.C.social reproduction.D.meritocracy.
Solution
The finding that first-generation immigrants between the ages of 25 and 34 are more likely to experience poverty, but second-generation immigrants of the same age group experience poverty at the same rate as the study participants, would best serve as societal evidence of B. intergenerational mobility.
Intergenerational mobility refers to the changes in social status that happen from one generation to the next within the same family. In this case, the first-generation immigrants experience a higher rate of poverty, but their children (the second-generation immigrants) have the same rate of poverty as the general population, indicating a positive change in social status between the two generations.
Similar Questions
Poverty may be the most foundational risk factor for poor health outcomes. Although poverty thresholds are calculated in a variety of ways, many international organizations define poverty thresholds as 50% of the median household income in a given country. Since the United States Census Bureau first began publishing an official U.S. poverty estimate in the 1960s, the percentage of the population living in poverty has fluctuated between roughly 10% and 15%. Extensive research shows a correlation between social stratification and health outcomes, with better outcomes corresponding to higher strata.Concentration of PovertyAccording to U.S. Census Bureau data, roughly 1 in 7 Americans is living in poverty, with almost 14 million residing in "high-poverty" neighborhoods (40% or more of residents below the federally defined poverty threshold), nearly double the amount since 1990. High-poverty neighborhoods also tend to have the highest rates of violent crime, so living in these neighborhoods poses both immediate (eg, physical assault) and long-term health threats, as living in an unsafe neighborhood acts as a chronic environmental stressor.Poverty and IsolationPoverty also prevents or limits access to many productive social activities, such as working, buying goods and services, community and political involvement, and engagement with social networks. The most impoverished members of society are often marginalized and may engage with mainstream society very little, if at all.Transmission of PovertyPoverty is transmitted across generations; numerous studies have found that individuals born into poverty are more likely to raise their own children in poverty. A longitudinal study of 100 households concluded that transmission of poverty occurs because lower-income parents lack economic resources, social connections, and knowledge about the education system, not because they differ from higher-income parents in wanting to help their children succeed. Experts also suggest that the education system perpetuates income disparities; schools in high-income neighborhoods have the most funding, best teachers, and highest graduation rates, whereas schools in low-income neighborhoods face numerous obstacles to obtaining supplies, retaining qualified teachers, and preventing student attrition.T. Chin & M. Phillips, "Social Reproduction and Child-rearing Practices:Social Class, Children's Agency, and the Summer Activity Gap." ©2004 SAGE Publications Question 27Which of the following statements is a situational attribution that is consistent with the information in the passage?A.Individuals born into low-income families remain impoverished because they lack motivation.B.Individuals from low-income neighborhoods drop out of school due to environmental stressors.C.Individuals who break the cycle of poverty are more resilient than those who remain impoverished.D.Individuals just above the poverty threshold have significantly better health than those just below it.
The Poverty Level is the official designation of an income below that which is needed to provide the kind of living our society considers to be a basic right. The Federal Government definition of the poverty level for one person in 2022 was: Question 19Select one:a.$10,760 per year.b.$13,590 per year.c.$11,240 per year.d.$17,240 per year.e.$14,240 per year.
The level of personal or family income below which one is classified as poor according to governmental standards:Select one:a.Poverty lineb.Social Classc.Income matrixd.Lifestyle reference
The poorest 20 percent of families in the United States make up the lower class. According to data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, what percentage of all U.S. income is earned by the 20 percent of families with the lowest income?A.8 percentB.less than 1 percentC.more than 10 percentD.about 4 percent
explain poverty
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.