Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.All systems of morality are based on the idea that an action has consequences that legitimize or cancel it. A mind imbued with the absurd merely judges that those consequences must be considered calmly. It is ready to pay up. In other words, there may be responsible persons, but there are no guilty ones, in its opinion. At very most, such a mind will consent to use past experience as a basis for its future actions. Time will prolong time, and life will serve life. In this field that is both limited and bulging with possibilities, everything in himself, except his lucidity, seems unforeseeable to him. What rule, then, could emanate from that unreasonable order? The only truth that might seem instructive to him is not formal: it comes to life and unfolds in men. The absurd mind cannot so much expect ethical rules at the end of its reasoning as, rather, illustrations and the breath of human lives.Morality systems are based on consequential actions, but an absurd mind views consequences calmly, focusing on personal lucidity and seeking truth in experiences rather than ethical rules.All moral systems legitimize actions based on their consequences, and the absurd mind, acknowledging this, uses past experiences to guide future actions, valuing human life and time.The absurd mind, recognizing that actions have consequences in moral systems, dismisses guilt and focuses on using past experience for future decisions, finding truth in the unpredictability of human lives.In moral systems, actions are judged by their consequences; however, the mind sees no guilt, only responsibility, and relies on human experiences over formal rules to form its understanding of truth.

Question

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.All systems of morality are based on the idea that an action has consequences that legitimize or cancel it. A mind imbued with the absurd merely judges that those consequences must be considered calmly. It is ready to pay up. In other words, there may be responsible persons, but there are no guilty ones, in its opinion. At very most, such a mind will consent to use past experience as a basis for its future actions. Time will prolong time, and life will serve life. In this field that is both limited and bulging with possibilities, everything in himself, except his lucidity, seems unforeseeable to him. What rule, then, could emanate from that unreasonable order? The only truth that might seem instructive to him is not formal: it comes to life and unfolds in men. The absurd mind cannot so much expect ethical rules at the end of its reasoning as, rather, illustrations and the breath of human lives.Morality systems are based on consequential actions, but an absurd mind views consequences calmly, focusing on personal lucidity and seeking truth in experiences rather than ethical rules.All moral systems legitimize actions based on their consequences, and the absurd mind, acknowledging this, uses past experiences to guide future actions, valuing human life and time.The absurd mind, recognizing that actions have consequences in moral systems, dismisses guilt and focuses on using past experience for future decisions, finding truth in the unpredictability of human lives.In moral systems, actions are judged by their consequences; however, the mind sees no guilt, only responsibility, and relies on human experiences over formal rules to form its understanding of truth.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The third option best captures the essence of the passage:

"The absurd mind, recognizing that actions have consequences in moral systems, dismisses guilt and focuses on using past experience for future decisions, finding truth in the unpredictability of human lives."

Similar Questions

-------- is a central part of ethics and should be given due consideration in our moral livesQuestionEthicsResponsibilityEnvironmentJustice

Of the four justifications for punishment, __________ is the oldest and perceives punishment as society’s revenge for a moral wrong.A.deterrenceB.retributionC.societal protectionD.rehabilitation

Morality is concerned with the results of wrong action, when done.a.Agreeb.Disagreec.Slightly disagreed.I don't knowe.Not at all

At the heart of human agency lies the thorny labyrinth of ethical dilemmas. How does one navigate the tangled web of morality when confronted with circumstances that seem irreconcilable? Can we truly unravel the delicate threads of right and wrong, or do we merely find solace in embracing the veil of relativism? To navigate this intricate maze, we must draw upon the insights of ethical philosophers from antiquity to modernity. From Aristotle's virtue ethics to Kant's categorical imperatives, each school of thought presents a unique lens through which we can perceive the moral landscape.In this ballet of human existence, power emerges as a resounding force, capable of moulding the trajectories of both individuals and societies. Like a potent elixir, power has the ability to embolden the virtuous to catalyse positive change and to corrupt the meek into agents of malevolence. But what constitutes power? Is it a tangible construct, confined to the realms of politics and governance, or does it possess an intangible essence that pervades our very consciousness? The answers, it appears, lie in the esoteric realm where philosophy converges with sociology.To truly comprehend the symphony of ethics and power, we must heed the echoes of Hegel's dialectical method. As thesis and antithesis collide, a new synthesis emerges, encompassing the essence of both predecessors while transcending their limitations. Could this dialectical dance elucidate the evolving nature of ethics and power? Are we destined to witness perpetual clashes, leading to ever-new manifestations of human agency, driven by the unending pursuit of balance and harmony?As we dissect the intricacies of human agency, the paradox of freedom and responsibility confronts us with profound bewilderment. Does true freedom lie in the unrestricted exercise of power, or is it inextricably linked with the embrace of moral responsibility? Like a pair of inseparable twins, freedom and responsibility dance a delicate waltz, urging us to ponder whether one can truly exist without the other. In this philosophical conundrum, we find ourselves standing at the crossroads of determinism and free will.Within the realm of human agency lies the fateful burden of choice, which often invokes existential angst. Like a labyrinth of infinite possibilities, each choice bears the weight of consequence, shaping the course of our existence. Is this existential anxiety a mere byproduct of our cognitive faculties, or does it transcend the boundaries of our corporeal selves, leading us into the abyss of the unknown?Q 24.   Which of the following options BEST captures the essence of power according to the passage?A)  Tangible construct that shapes politics and governance.B)  Intangible essence that influences our consciousness.C)  Dominant force that can strengthen or weaken individuals and societies.D)  Potent elixir that can catalyse positive change or malevolence.E)  An esoteric realm where philosophy converges with sociology.1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526Legend :  Answered   Not Answered  Marked   Not Visited

Moral dilemmas are conflicts of duties or responsibilities, solutions must be tailored to the special details of individual circumstances

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.