If the government abolishes minimum wages, what kind of policy is this?
Question
If the government abolishes minimum wages, what kind of policy is this?
Solution
This is an example of a laissez-faire economic policy. Laissez-faire is a French term that translates as 'let do', and in economic contexts, it is used to describe a policy environment in which there is minimal government intervention.
The abolition of minimum wages would mean that the government is not intervening to set a legal minimum for what employers can pay their workers. This would leave wage determination to the forces of supply and demand in the labor market.
In a broader context, this could be seen as part of a neoliberal policy agenda, which advocates for reduced government intervention in the economy and greater role for market forces.
Similar Questions
(Consider a Macroeconomics perspective) Minimum wage is a government intervention on labour compensation which is equivalent to a price floor in the labour market. Although it aims to protect the well being of workers, it would also increase firms’ (three words). As a result, it would cause the (two words) to shift leftward, resulting in a decrease in real output and an increase in the (three words).
Passage 1 Raising the minimum wage for workers will provide a significant boost to the economy. For example, changing the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would add $22 billion to the economy by increasing people’s purchasing power. Household spending would increase by $48 billion in one year with a similar minimum wage increase. Increased earnings lead to increased spending and a greater demand for products and services. This phenomenon then leads to the need for more workers and, thereby, job growth. Passage 2 The current federal minimum wage for workers is $7.25. If the government increased that by $1.75, studies show that household spending would also increase—by $48 billion annually. An economic move like this makes too much sense to ignore. A rise in household spending would mean an expansion in the profits of many businesses, including small businesses. As a small-business owner, I would certainly welcome the extra income. The last time the minimum wage was increased, my profit margin increased substantially. My fellow small-business owners experienced a similar profit growth that year. Which passage provides more effective evidence, and why? Passage 1 is more effective because the evidence is logical and does not include fallacies. Passage 1 is more effective because the evidence is logical and cannot be opposed. Passage 2 is more effective because the evidence is emotional and includes two perspectives. Passage 2 is more effective because the evidence is logical and is supported by anecdotes.
Children, education, medical expenses, recreation, old age & marriage, etc. should constitute _______ of the total minimum wage
The federal government’s ability to set a minimum wage is:A.a concurrent power, because the federal government works with state governments to accomplish this.B.a reserved power, because the Constitution specifically assigns this power to the states.C.an implied power, because the Constitution allows it to regulate interstate commerce.D.an expressed power, because the Constitution specifically allows Congress to establish wages.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
If the economy is experiencing unemployment, then the most appropriate government policy would be to shift the aggregate:
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.