"Schools also censor by prohibiting some articles to be printed in student newspapers. Approximately 74 percent of high schools in the United States offer student newspapers or journalism programs (Barron, 2010). Student publications are a safe venue where adolescents can express their opinions. These programs are often run by students and overseen by teachers and other adults at the school. Before articles are printed, they usually go through an editing and review process. Although this is a normal part of the publication process, it can sometimes lead to censorship. There have been many cases where portions of the text or entire articles have been removed from school newspapers for being inappropriate. A famous Supreme Court case involving this issue occurred in 1988 in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. The principal of Hazelwood East High School prohibited two topics from being printed in the school newspaper. Hazelwood East students brought the case to court, arguing that their First Amendment right to free speech had been violated. In this case, the court ruled that the principal did not violate the students’ free speech right. The court pointed out that the school newspaper was not a 'public forum,' and that, therefore, students did not have the same First Amendment rights as other journalists (Student Press Law Center, 2014). Many people were outraged by this decision and continue to fight censorship in school newspapers." Which of the sources from these references entries contains the information about the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier Supreme Court case? American Library Association. (2014). Banned books that shaped America.  BannedBooksWeek.org. http://www.bannedbooksweek.org/censorship/bannedbooksthatshapedamerica Student Press Law Center. (2014). The Hazelwood decision and student press. Scholastic.com. http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/hazelwood-decision-and-student-press Barron, J. (27 April 2010). News business lags at high schools, too. The New York Times. http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/news-business-lags-at-high-schools-too/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988). https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-836

T/F: Student journalists in public schools receive fewer First Amendment protections than adult journalists.

While the internet provides a vast amount of information, there is also content, such as pornography and violence, that is unsuitable for children and young people.Select one:a.Privacy Invasionb.Age-inappropriate contentc.Online Educationd.Citizen Journalism

Read the following excerpt from an article. Since 1982, various groups have sought to remove or restrict access to 11,300 books in our nation's schools and libraries (Crum, 2013). Look at the article's references page: Barron, J. (27 April 2010). “News business lags at high schools, too.” The New York Times. Retrieved from http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/news-business-lags-at-high-schools-too/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0. Crum, M. (22 Sept 2013). “7 reasons your favorite books were banned.” Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/22/banned-books_n_3961834.html Student Press Law Center (2014). “The Hazelwood decision and student press.” Scholastic.com. Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/hazelwood-decision-and-student-press American Civil Liberties Union. (4 Nov 1999). “All dressed up and nowhere to go: Students and their parents fight uniform policies.” Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/free-speech/all-dressed-and-nowhere-go-students-and-their-parents-fight-school-uniform-policies According to APA style, which source correlates to the citation in the excerpt? a. “All dressed up and nowhere to go: Students and their parents fight uniform policies.” b. “The Hazelwood decision and student press.” Scholastic.com. c. “7 reasons your favorite books were banned.” Huffington Post. d. “News business lags at high schools, too.” The New York Times.

From the early days of radio and movies to the vast resources of today’s World Wide Web, the mass media have been an object of fascination for youth. Yet parents, educators, and youth advocates have long been uneasy about many of the media messages that children and teenagers encounter. Popular culture can glamorize violence, irresponsible actions, junk food, drugs, and alcohol; it can reinforce stereotypes; it can prescribe the lifestyle to which one should aspire, and the products one must buy to attain it.>2 Thus, it isn’t surprising that calls to censor the mass media in the interest of protecting youth have been a mainstay of American politics for many years. Attempts to censor gangster movies in the 1930s, crime comics in the 1950s, and TV violence today have produced an almost unending series of laws, regulations, and proposals for restricting the art, information, and entertainment available to youth. The advent of the Internet as a medium in which young people are often better versed than their elders has only intensified these concerns.>3 There are many reasons why overarching censorship is an unsatisfactory response to concerns about the mass media and its effects on youth. Foremost is the First Amendment, which protects our ability to read, watch, listen, access ideas, and think about them. This First Amendment protection is not simply a legal technicality to be overcome if possible by laws or policies cleverly crafted to avoid constitutional pitfalls. The right to explore art and ideas is basic to a free society. Without it, adolescents cannot grow into the thoughtful, educated citizens who are essential to a functioning democracy.>4 Some people point to "violence in the media," "extreme violence," or "gratuitous violence" as inappropriate and harmful to children. But these are elastic and subjective concepts. And most of those who think that "media violence" is bad for young adults acknowledge that they don’t mean to include televised versions of Shakespeare, Sophocles, or Saving Private Ryan.>5 Context counts for everything in art and entertainment: how is the violence presented; what are the consequences; what are the ambiguities in the story? There is no way that a censorship law or a simplistic letter-or-number rating system can make these judgments. As media scholars have observed, because different youngsters react very differently to the mythology, symbols, and stories in popular entertainment, "universalizing claims are fundamentally inadequate in accounting for media’s social and cultural impact."Which is the MOST LOGICAL place in the essay for the following sentence?It is difficult for people to agree on what should be censored, and to define it in terms that are clear enough to put publishers and distributors on notice of what is banned.ResponsesA At the beginning of paragraph 1At the beginning of paragraph 1B At the end of paragraph 2At the end of paragraph 2C At the beginning of paragraph 4At the beginning of paragraph 4D At the end of paragraph 4

T/F: In order to have more First Amendment rights, a school newspaper can establish itself as a public forum either through written statement or through precedent.