The paradox of the Roman empire’s history is marked by the fall of the western part around the 5th century A.D **with several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency, breaking into independent kingdoms, the rise of the eastern part, with the empire re-walling the crises, and retaking **g most of the lost territories to establish a firm rule of over most of the Eastern Europe for another six to seven centuriesChoose the best optionClear Responsewith several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency, breaking into independent kingdoms, the rise of the eastern part, with the empire fire - walling the crises, and retakingas several regions succumbed to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and broke into independent kingdoms, and the rising of the eastern part as the empire fire-walled the crises and retookwhen several regions succumbed to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and broke into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, where the empire fire-walled the crises to retakewith several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, with the empire fire -walling the crises, and retakingamid several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency broke into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, as the empire fire -walling the crises, retook
Question
The paradox of the Roman empire’s history is marked by the fall of the western part around the 5th century A.D **with several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency, breaking into independent kingdoms, the rise of the eastern part, with the empire re-walling the crises, and retaking **g most of the lost territories to establish a firm rule of over most of the Eastern Europe for another six to seven centuriesChoose the best optionClear Responsewith several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency, breaking into independent kingdoms, the rise of the eastern part, with the empire fire - walling the crises, and retakingas several regions succumbed to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and broke into independent kingdoms, and the rising of the eastern part as the empire fire-walled the crises and retookwhen several regions succumbed to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and broke into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, where the empire fire-walled the crises to retakewith several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and breaking into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, with the empire fire -walling the crises, and retakingamid several regions succumbing to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency broke into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, as the empire fire -walling the crises, retook
Solution
The best option is: "when several regions succumbed to cross border terrorism and internal insurgency and broke into independent kingdoms, and by the rise of the eastern part, where the empire fire-walled the crises to retake". This option provides a clear and concise explanation of the paradox of the Roman Empire's history. It uses past tense verbs to accurately describe historical events and uses appropriate prepositions to connect ideas.
Similar Questions
Who attempted to address the decline of the Roman Empire through reforms but only achieved partial success?
Which one of the following was not considered a factor in the fall of the Roman Empire?Athe vast geographical area of the Empire which made it difficult to controlBa weakening in the strength of the military because of an insufficient number of Roman soldiersCinsufficient financial support for the government due to little or no taxationDdecline in patriotic and moral sentiment due to an increasing divide between the upper and lower classes
In Western Europe, the decline of the Western Roman empire led to the rise of modern capitalism.Question 19Answera.Falseb.True
Which of the following impacts did Emperor Justinian the Great have on the Roman Empire?he ordered the murder of Julius Caesarhe began the system of rule known as the tetrarchyhe temporarily reunified the empirehe led it into a disastrous war with Persiahe caused it to split in half
The main challenge to Roman control of the Mediterranean in the third century b.c.e. came fromGroup of answer choicesAlexandria.Carthage.Ptolemaic Egypt.the Etruscans.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.