What RULE (law) did the court follow in the Townsend Ford v Hinds Ford case? (Choose TWO correct answers)Multiple select question.Five elements: binding contract, non-breaching party performed, other party did not perform, meeting of the minds, breaching party incured damages.Four elements for binding contract: offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, just consideration, certainty as to essential terms.Four elements for breach: binding contract, non-breaching party performed, other party failed to perform, nonbreaching party suffered damages.Four elements for binding contract: offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, consideration, certainty as to essential terms.

What was the court's CONCLUSION (holding, decision) in the Townsend Ford v Hinds Ford case?Multiple choice question.For Townsend Ford. Summary judgment denied, as a matter of law, based on for fraud and equitable estoppel.For Townsend Ford. Summary judgment as a matter of law for $736,225.40.For Hinds Ford. Summary judgment as a matter of law for $736,225.40.For Hinds Ford. Summary judgment denied, as a matter of law, based on for fraud and equitable estoppel.

What was the main ISSUE (legal question) in the Townsend Ford v Hinds Ford case?Multiple choice question.Whether Don Hinds Ford (seller) is liable to Townsend Ford (buyer) for the price of the contract?Whether there was adequate consideration for Key Logistics to create an enforceable contract?Whether Don Hinds Ford (buyer) is liable to Townsend Ford (seller) for the price of the contract?Whether there was adequate consideration for Don Hinds Ford to create an enforceable contract?

What was the court's CONCLUSION (holding, decision) in the Townsend Ford v Hinds Ford case?

Multiple Choice QuestionParties to a legal dispute may decide to arbitrate that dispute by entering into a Blank______.Multiple choice question.consent judgmentsubmission agreementmediation accordrelease

Justin went to court and contended that his automobile sales contract was unconscionable due to the high penalties for nonpayment. The court agreed with Justin that the penalties for nonpayment were unconscionable, but it found that all of the other material terms of the sale were proper. The court may choose to: Blank______.Multiple choice question.order the parties to negotiate a new automobile sales contractenforce the provisions of the contract that the court deems as being faironly enforce the entire contract because there was an agreement between the partiesenforce the contract in its entirety and warn the parties to beware of unconscionable clauses in the future