s random sampling more likely to have a significant change in the gene pool of a large population or a small population?Group of answer choicesLargeSmall
Question
s random sampling more likely to have a significant change in the gene pool of a large population or a small population?Group of answer choicesLargeSmall
Solution
Random sampling is more likely to have a significant change in the gene pool of a small population. This is because in a small population, each individual represents a larger fraction of the total gene pool. Therefore, the removal or addition of even a few individuals can significantly alter the frequency of certain genes in the population. In contrast, in a large population, each individual represents a smaller fraction of the total gene pool, so changes in individual genes have a smaller overall impact.
Similar Questions
A sample of size n is selected at random from an infinite population. As n increases the standard error of the sample mean decreases.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
The loss of genetic variation that occurs when a new population is established by a very small number of individuals from a larger population is ------------------ Group of answer choicesNonepopulation bottleneckPolyploidyFounder's effect
As the sample size increases, theGroup of answer choicespopulation mean increasesstandard deviation of the population decreasesstandard error of the mean decreasesstandard error of the mean increases
Statistical Inference focuses on drawing conclusions about populations from samples?Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
What is the genetic make-up of an entire population?Group of answer choicesPopulationMacroevolutionGene poolMicroevolution
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.