41.Question 41Aashka is negotiating to sell her car to Juana. During the negotiation, Aashka tells Juana that someone else has offered to purchase the car for 5000. In fact, no one else has made an offer to purchase the car. Based on Aashka's statement, Juana agrees to purchase the car for 5200. If Juana later learns of Aashka's lie and decides to sue her: (select one):1 pointShe cannot recover damages for fraud because she should expect sellers to use this type of deception.She can recover damages because Aashka breached her fiduciary duty.She can recover her attorney fees from Aashka if she litigates the case in the United States and wins.all of the above.two of the above.none of the above.

18.Question 18Harinee is negotiating to sell her car to Sam. During negotiations, Sam asks Harinee whether the car has ever been damaged in an accident. Harinee says “absolutely not.” This is a lie. She was involved in a serious accident in which a passenger in her car was killed. After the accident she had the car completely repaired and the damage is not noticeable. Based on Harinee’s answer, Sam bought the car but later discovered the lie. Harinee has violated which of the following legal rules (select one):1 pointfiduciary dutyunconscionabilityfraudall of the abovetwo of the abovenone of the above

16.Question 16Jessica manufactures components for a product. She has sued one of her customers, Michael, in the United States for payment. Michael claims that the components that Jessica delivered were defective. They are now negotiating a possible settlement. Jessica is asking the court to award her 400,000 in damages and she agreed to pay her attorney a 30% contingency fee. There is a 50% chance that she will win. If they go to court, she estimates that Michael’s attorney’s fees will total 80,000. Based on a decision tree calculation, the value of Jessica’s litigation BATNA based only on these facts is (select one):1 point400,000.280,000.200,000.140,000.110,000.none of the above.

An injured buyer can recover consequential damages from a seller by showing that: ________.Multiple choice question.the seller knew (or should have known) she could have prevented damages by obtaining substitute goodsthe seller made (or should have made) profits out of the sales contractthe contract price is higher than the cost price of the substitute goodsthe seller knew (or should have known) the buyer would suffer damages if the seller failed to perform

Assuming a buyer repudiates the sales contract, or refuses to accept goods that conform to the contract, the seller ________.Multiple choice question.must not give buyers credit for any expenses that seller has saved during the sales.is entitled to recover for emotional damages that must be paid during the delivery.cannot recover any incidental damages while goods are being delivered to the buyer.may recover damages, that is, the difference between the contract price and the market price at the time of delivery.

17.Question 17Same facts as #16, except that Jessica files her lawsuit outside the US in a country that uses a "loser pays" rule. Instead of hiring her attorney on a contingency fee, she agrees to pay the attorney a fixed fee of 90,000. Based on a decision tree calculation, the value of Jessica’s litigation BATNA based on these revised facts is (select one):1 point200,000.155,000.115,000.110,000.70,000none of the above.18.Question 18Harinee is negotiating to sell her car to Sam. During negotiations, Sam asks Harinee whether the car has ever been damaged in an accident. Harinee says “absolutely not.” This is a lie. She was involved in a serious accident in which a passenger in her car was killed. After the accident she had the car completely repaired and the damage is not noticeable. Based on Harinee’s answer, Sam bought the car but later discovered the lie. Harinee has violated which of the following legal rules (select one):1 pointfiduciary dutyunconscionabilityfraudall of the abovetwo of the abovenone of the above