Materials and MethodsEthics StatementApproval for this study was granted from the University ofSydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval number15474).The QuestionnairePrior to publication of the questionnaire, advice was soughtfrom members of the Working Kelpie Council of Australia toensure that the question terminology was appropriate for thetarget audience. A pilot distribution of the survey to 125 solicitedparticipants led to some minor modifications prior to widespreaddistribution.The online version of the Farm Dog Survey was administeredfor a three-month period from 10 March 2013 to 10 June 2013.All promotional materials indicated that a hard copy of the surveywith a reply paid envelope could be pro
Question
Materials and MethodsEthics StatementApproval for this study was granted from the University ofSydney Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval number15474).The QuestionnairePrior to publication of the questionnaire, advice was soughtfrom members of the Working Kelpie Council of Australia toensure that the question terminology was appropriate for thetarget audience. A pilot distribution of the survey to 125 solicitedparticipants led to some minor modifications prior to widespreaddistribution.The online version of the Farm Dog Survey was administeredfor a three-month period from 10 March 2013 to 10 June 2013.All promotional materials indicated that a hard copy of the surveywith a reply paid envelope could be pro
Solution
Materiales y MétodosDeclaración ÉticaSe obtuvo la aprobación para este estudio del Comité de Ética en Investigación con Seres Humanos de la Universidad de Sydney (Número de Aprobación 15474).El CuestionarioAntes de la publicación del cuestionario, se buscó asesoramiento de miembros del Consejo de Trabajo del Kelpie de Australia para asegurarse de que la terminología de las preguntas fuera apropiada para el público objetivo. Una distribución piloto de la encuesta a 125 participantes solicitados condujo a algunas modificaciones menores antes de la distribución generalizada.La versión en línea de la Encuesta de Perros de Granja se administró durante un período de tres meses, desde el 10 de marzo de 2013 hasta el 10 de junio de 2013. Todos los materiales promocionales indicaban que se podía obtener una copia impresa de la encuesta con un sobre de respuesta pagado.
Similar Questions
II. Research Problems The objective of the research is to provide pertinent and accurate answers to the following questions: How many pet owners have a native dog?What factors contribute to the discrimination against Aspins? Do dog owners prefer to have breed dogs instead of native ones (aspins)? Do dog owners behave differently when they see native dogs? III. Collection of DataThe researcher will employ a quantitative research method, utilizing Google Forms as the tool for data gathering. The primary sources of information will consist of 50 dog owners, selected as respondents. Before participation, each respondent will be requested to sign a consent form, demonstrating their willingness to engage in the study. Once consent is obtained, participants will receive a structured questionnaire designed to collect quantitative data. IV. INTERPRETATION OF DATAResults Analysis and DiscussionFindings on the survey conducted are presented here in tabular form. Results are analyzed and discussed, substantiated by pertinent related literature and studies. Pie ChartSop 1: How many pet owners have a native dog?As presented in the pie chart 11, with a percentage of 64. 5% of the respondents answered yes, while 35. 5% answer no. The data shows that most dog owners prefer to own a dog with pure breeds rather than native ones (Aspin).Sop 2: What factors contribute to the discrimination against Aspins? In pie chart 2, almost all of the respondents answer yes with a percentage of 96.2 % on the contrary, 4 % answer the question no. This means that respondents believe that education programs could raise awareness that would effectively reduce discrimination against aspins. Pie chart 3 illustrates 90.6% of respondents, that think stereotypes can be used to further discriminate against people in their community. Conversely, 9.4% of respondents selected "no," indicating that they don't think stereotypes play a role in the prejudice against aspins. As seen in pie chart 6, where 94.3 % of respondents cite the loyalty and intelligence that aspins possess above other breeds, positive traits are also a contributing factor, albeit in a positive way. However, a sizable portion rejects the advantages of aspins. According to Pie graph 7, data indicates that 67.9% of respondents think that economics can play a role in the discrimination against aspins, such as veterinary care, while 32.1% disagree. The data shows in pie chart 8, that 73.6 % believe that community can be a factor of discrimination by treating Filipino native dogs differently from pure breeds. Contradicting to this 26.4% of the respondents said there's no mistreatment of aspins from their community. In pie chart 9 most of the respondents with 96.2% support the idea of legal measures to prohibit discrimination against aspins while 4% disagree with the legal measures to protect aspins from discrimination. Pie chart 10 indicates that 88.7% of respondents think that Filipino native dogs' advantages are not well known, which fuels discrimination against them, while 11.7% disagree, saying that ignorance does not increase the number of cases of discrimination against native Filipino dogs. Sop 3: Do dog owners prefer to have breed dogs instead of native ones (aspins)?Pie chart 1 indicates the results of a survey asking people whether they believe dog owners generally prefer to breed dogs over native ones. 75.5% of respondents believe dog owners lean towards bred dogs. Only 24.5% held the opposing view, suggesting that the perception of breed dog preference is quite prevalent.Sop 4: Do dog owners behave differently when they see native dogs?As presented in pie graphs 5 & 8, eighty-one (81.1%) of respondents exhibit different behavior when encountering native dogs (Aspin), while eighteen percent (18.9%) do not. Additionally, seventy-three percent (73.6%) of respondents believe that dog owners in the community treat Aspins differently based on their native breed, while twenty-six percent (26.4%) disagree. The data reveals that the majority of participants agreed that when faced with native dogs, known as aspins, a significant portion of dog owners tend to demonstrate distinctive behavior.
Multiple Choice QuestionIf informed consent is key to research conducted with humans, what is key to research conducted with animals?Multiple choice question.Proper debriefingBeneficencePrivacy and confidentialityHumane treatment
The basic technique of ethnographic research is ______.Multiple choice question.questionnairesexperimentsobservationresearch reviews
The two main forms of the survey are ______.Multiple choice question.ethnography and experimentsexperiments and interviewsquestionnaires and existing sourcesinterviews and questionnaires
Why is it important that the use of animals in research or teaching is reviewed and approved by an Institutional Animal Ethics Committee? Please refer to the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes in your answer.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.