The following is a review of a book on Amazon.com:  “This Marxist French fool doesn't have a grasp on reality (like most socialist) this waste of paper is good for only one thing, a bon fire! What a bunch of garbage!”  This review is not a well-reasoned argument because it contains the following flaw in logical reasoning:Group of answer choicesAlternative explanationPersonal attackImproper generalizationAppeal to emotionThere is no logical flaw in the argument.

Karl Marx argued that "people are what they think, not what they do."Group of answer choicestruefalse

If a flaw exists, identify the flaw in logical reasoning used in the argument below."Mauricio starts teaching at a local school with 200 students. On his first day, one student makes a disrespectful comment. Mauricio concludes "All the students at this terrible school are disrespectful."Group of answer choicesAlternative explanationImproper generalizationPersonal attackThere is no logical flaw in the argumentAppeal to emotion

Argument Against the Person (Argumentum ad Hominem) is rejecting an argument by attacking the person who offered it – either in pointing out a character flaw to imputing evil intentions.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

If a flaw exists, identify the flaw in logical reasoning used in the argument below. The school gives each teacher chocolate on a special day. The teachers then have busy days full of responsibilities. By the end of the day many teachers are tired. Jacob concludes that chocolate makes teachers tired.Group of answer choicesThere is no logical flaw in the argumentAppeal to emotionAlternative explanationPersonal attackImproper generalization

No audience is ever persuaded by rational argument.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse