Which of the following is INCORRECT? Select one: a. A duty of care can arise where the defendant knew or should have known that the plaintiff will rely on the advice or information. b. A disclaimer can be effective in removing liability for a negligent misstatement. c. A duty of care can only arise where the defendant is actually aware that the plaintiff will rely on the advice or information. d. A negligent misstatement, whether spoken or written, can give rise to an action in negligence for financial loss.

‘It is preferable, in my view, that the law should develop novel categoriesof negligence incrementally and by analogy with established categories,rather than by a massive extension of a prima facie duty of care…’(Brennan, J.)Discuss, with reference to negligent misstatement.

Explain the difference between: Due Care Due Diligence Negligence When determining Risk in a Network security / Information security context. (3 Sentences Max)

Which of these is the most accurate definition of Duty of Care?Group of answer choicesEmployers have a duty to care for their staff and stakeholdersAn employee has a duty to eliminate or mitigate any hazards in their workplaceA person is negligent unless they take precautions against a risk of harm which is foreseeable and significant and which a reasonable person would takeAn employee has a duty to eliminate or mitigate any hazards in their workplace

When assessing damages for the breach of a duty of care, which of the following is CORRECT? Select one: a. There are no limits on damages. A defendant is liable for all consequences of their actions. b. The negligence must be the sole cause of the plaintiff's loss. c. The loss must be caused by the breach of the duty of care and also not too remote. d. A clear causal connection between the events that took place and the loss that occurred is enough for the defendant to be liable for all losses caused.

In assessing breach of the duty of care for negligent misstatement, which of the following is INCORRECT? Select one: a. The court will apply the four factors in the Wrongs Act s 48, following what is known as the balancing test or the weighing test. b. The standard of care is assessed objectively, applying the reasonable person test to see what a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would have done in the circumstances. c. The court will impose a higher standard of care where the defendant claims to have specialist knowledge and expertise, beyond that normally held. d. If the defendant is a professional, the standard of care expected is that of the ordinary skilled person in the same profession as the defendant.