What was the main ISSUE (legal question) in the Helena Chemical Co v Williamson case?Multiple choice question.Was the warning and remedies limitation in compliance with Section 1 of the UCC regarding font size?Was the agreement Williamson signed with Helena an unconscionable limitation of remedies?Was the agreement Williamson signed with Helena clear and unambiguous?Were the charges Helena invoiced Williamson for in the agreement beyond the market prices?

What was the court's CONCLUSION (holding,decision) in the Helena Chemical Co v Williamson case?Multiple choice question.For Helena Chemical. The limitation of remedies provision was in good faith and fair between the parties.For WIlliamson. Limitations of remedies provision fails of its essential purpose and he is not prevented from receiving consequential damages.For Helena Chemical. Williamson breached the contract based on the unambiguous language in the remedies and default sectionFor Helena Chemical. Limitation of remedies provision fails of its essential purpose so it is not prevented from receiving foreseeable damages.

What was the main ISSUE (legal question) in the Beer v Bennett case?Multiple choice question.Can a seller enforce the purchase when the buyer rescinds the contract?What is the correct measure of damages when the seller rescinds the contract?What is the correct measure of damages when the buyer rescinds the contract?Under the UCC is specific performance available when the buyer rescinds the contract?

When a limitation on a buyer's remedies on breach by a seller is unconscionable, the __________.Multiple choice question.court has the right to charge cases on the seller for causing emotional damages.buyer will be sued for using the remedies.buyer has all the rights given to an injured buyer under the UCC.court will enforce the limitation.

When a limitation on a buyer's remedies on breach by a seller is unconscionable, the __________.Multiple choice question.buyer will be sued for using the remedies.court will enforce the limitation.court has the right to charge cases on the seller for causing emotional damages.buyer has all the rights given to an injured buyer under the UCC.

What was the main ISSUE (legal question) in the Cahaba Disaster Recovery v. Rogers case?Multiple choice question.Did Rogers' email of nonconforming goods serve as an adequate notice under the UCC?Did International Lining’s tender of FOC boom conform to the terms of its contract with Cahaba?Did International Lining’s email of nonconforming goods serve as an adequate notice under the UCC?Did Cahaba's tender of FOC boom conform to the terms of its contract with International Lining?