To answer this question, we need to understand the role each option played in the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century.

(a) Role of the Press: The press played a significant role in the growth of nationalism in India. It was a medium through which nationalist ideas and sentiments were propagated among the masses. Therefore, this option contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(b) Administrative Unification: The administrative unification of India under British rule also contributed to the growth of nationalism. It brought different regions of India under a common administrative framework, which helped in the growth of a collective identity and national consciousness among the people. Therefore, this option also contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(c) Repressive Policies of Lord Lytton: Lord Lytton was known for his repressive policies, such as the Vernacular Press Act, which curtailed the freedom of the Indian press. These policies led to widespread discontent and resentment among the Indian people, which in turn fueled the growth of nationalism. Therefore, this option also contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie: Lord Dalhousie's policies, such as the Doctrine of Lapse and the annexation of Indian states, led to widespread discontent and resentment among the Indian people. However, Lord Dalhousie's tenure was in the mid-19th century, and the growth of nationalism in India is generally associated with the early 20th century. Therefore, while his policies may have sowed the seeds of nationalism, they did not directly contribute to its growth in the early 20th century.

Therefore, the answer to the question "Which of the following did NOT contribute to the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century?" is (d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie.

Question

To answer this question, we need to understand the role each option played in the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century.

(a) Role of the Press: The press played a significant role in the growth of nationalism in India. It was a medium through which nationalist ideas and sentiments were propagated among the masses. Therefore, this option contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(b) Administrative Unification: The administrative unification of India under British rule also contributed to the growth of nationalism. It brought different regions of India under a common administrative framework, which helped in the growth of a collective identity and national consciousness among the people. Therefore, this option also contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(c) Repressive Policies of Lord Lytton: Lord Lytton was known for his repressive policies, such as the Vernacular Press Act, which curtailed the freedom of the Indian press. These policies led to widespread discontent and resentment among the Indian people, which in turn fueled the growth of nationalism. Therefore, this option also contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie: Lord Dalhousie's policies, such as the Doctrine of Lapse and the annexation of Indian states, led to widespread discontent and resentment among the Indian people. However, Lord Dalhousie's tenure was in the mid-19th century, and the growth of nationalism in India is generally associated with the early 20th century. Therefore, while his policies may have sowed the seeds of nationalism, they did not directly contribute to its growth in the early 20th century.

Therefore, the answer to the question "Which of the following did NOT contribute to the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century?" is (d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

To answer this question, we need to understand the role each option played in the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century.

(a) Role of the Press: The press played a significant role in the growth of nationalism in India. It was a medium through which nationalist ideas and sentiments were propagated among the masses. Therefore, this option contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(b) Administrative Unification: The administrative unification of India under British rule also contributed to the growth of nationalism. It brought different regions of India under a common administrative framework, which helped in the growth of a collective identity and national consciousness among the people. Therefore, this option also contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(c) Repressive Policies of Lord Lytton: Lord Lytton was known for his repressive policies, such as the Vernacular Press Act, which curtailed the freedom of the Indian press. These policies led to widespread discontent and resentment among the Indian people, which in turn fueled the growth of nationalism. Therefore, this option also contributed to the growth of nationalism.

(d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie: Lord Dalhousie's policies, such as the Doctrine of Lapse and the annexation of Indian states, led to widespread discontent and resentment among the Indian people. However, Lord Dalhousie's tenure was in the mid-19th century, and the growth of nationalism in India is generally associated with the early 20th century. Therefore, while his policies may have sowed the seeds of nationalism, they did not directly contribute to its growth in the early 20th century.

Therefore, the answer to the question "Which of the following did NOT contribute to the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century?" is (d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie.

Which of the following did NOT contribute to the growth of nationalism in India in the early 20th century?(a) Role of the Press(b) Administrative Unification(c) Repressive Policies of Lord Lytton(d) Policies of Lord Dalhousie

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee