62. Animals (suffer and die) in classroom (biology experiments) and dissection, (because) modern non-animal tests have been shown to have educational value, save teachers time, and save (schools money).*Identify the one word/ phrase in parentheses that should be corrected or rewritten.1 poinA. suffer and dieB. biology experimentsC. becauseD. schools money63. Many animals, especially the higher mammalian species, .... internal systems and organs that are identical to the structures and functions of human internal organs.*1 poinA. posseB. possessC. possessingD. possessed64. Animal experimentation should be stopped ... it violates the rights of animals.*1 poinA. howeverB. becauseC. meanwhileD. consequently

Humans cannot justify making life better for themselves by randomly torturing and executing thousands of animals per year to perform laboratory experiments or to test products” in paragraph 5 refers to…*1 poinA. animalsB. humansC. productsD. experiments

which one of these are not true about PET?a) mostly for humans.b) the patient drinks or injected with a radioactive substance (2-DG).c) it measures the metabolic activity in the brain.d) has neuromagnetomers that contains SQUIDs.e) 2-DG has short lifetime.

Animal testing is a controversial issue that has sparked many debates and protests over the years. Some people argue that animal testing is necessary for the advancement of science and medicine, and that it can save human lives and reduce human suffering. They claim that animals are not morally equivalent to humans, and that they have fewer rights and interests than humans. They also point out that animal testing is regulated by laws and guidelines that ensure the welfare and protection of animals.Others contend that animal testing is cruel and unethical, and that it violates the rights and dignity of animals. They assert that animals are sentient beings that can feel pain and emotions, and that they have intrinsic value and moral status. They also challenge the validity and reliability of animal testing, and argue that it is often wasteful, irrelevant, and harmful to both animals and humans. They propose alternative methods of research that do not involve animal suffering, such as in vitro testing, computer modeling, and human volunteers.The debate over animal testing is not only a scientific one, but also a philosophical one. It involves questions about the nature and scope of morality, the value and purpose of life, and the relationship between humans and animals. It also reflects different ethical perspectives, such as utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and animal rights. Each of these perspectives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and none of them can provide a definitive answer to the ethical dilemma of animal testing.Q 14.   Which of the following is not a contention presented by critics of using animals in research, as per the passage?A)  Animals are capable of experiencing pain and emotions.B)  Ethical research methods like in vitro testing should be adopted.C)  The reliability and relevance of animal testing are questionable.D)  Human volunteers are more cost-effective for research.E)  Animal testing is not necessary for scientific progress and human health

Animal testing is a controversial issue that has sparked many debates and protests over the years. Some people argue that animal testing is necessary for the advancement of science and medicine, and that it can save human lives and reduce human suffering. They claim that animals are not morally equivalent to humans, and that they have fewer rights and interests than humans. They also point out that animal testing is regulated by laws and guidelines that ensure the welfare and protection of animals.Others contend that animal testing is cruel and unethical, and that it violates the rights and dignity of animals. They assert that animals are sentient beings that can feel pain and emotions, and that they have intrinsic value and moral status. They also challenge the validity and reliability of animal testing, and argue that it is often wasteful, irrelevant, and harmful to both animals and humans. They propose alternative methods of research that do not involve animal suffering, such as in vitro testing, computer modeling, and human volunteers.The debate over animal testing is not only a scientific one, but also a philosophical one. It involves questions about the nature and scope of morality, the value and purpose of life, and the relationship between humans and animals. It also reflects different ethical perspectives, such as utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and animal rights. Each of these perspectives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and none of them can provide a definitive answer to the ethical dilemma of animal testing.Q 13.   Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?A)  Animal testing is an inherently cruel and unethical practice that should be completely abolished.B)  Those who advocate for animal testing prioritize human well-being over animal welfare.C)  Animal testing is the only reliable method for advancing scientific knowledge and medical breakthroughs.D)  The regulations and guidelines governing animal testing are insufficient in protecting animals from harm.E)  Animals have the same moral status and rights as humans, according to proponents of animal testing.

Explain two contrasting beliefs about animal testing (4 marks)