Julie was imprisoned for 5 years. Julie took part in a parole hearing where her risk of reoffending was deemed to be low. Julie was subsequently released from prison. Several months after being released from prison, Julie reoffended, committing the same crime that landed her in prison the first time. The risk assessment decision that was made in Julie’s case would therefore be considered which one of the following?

Many studies have shown that, on release, offenders may be more likely to commit crimes than before they were imprisoned. In that case, ______________ may increase likelihood of crime, rather than diminish it.Group of answer choicesRetributionDeterenceIncapacitationGeneral Deterence

Emma was convicted of larceny and is currently undergoing therapy. She is visited by a counselor on a regular basis and also receives vocational and educational training to help her reintegrate with society. In the context of the goals of punishment, this scenario best exemplifies __________.Group of answer choicesretributionrehabilitationselective incapacitationgeneral deterrence

Determine the level of risk to yourself in this incident? What was the level of risk?

___________________ guarantees that they will not be a danger to society, at least for the length of their prison terms. Group of answer choicesRestorative JusticeDeterrenceIncarcerationRetribution

Which of the following has NOT generally been found in research on parole release?Group of answer choicesall of the above have been foundthe chances of failure are generally highest during the early stages of paroleinmates released from prison on parole for the first time are more likely to succeed than re-releasesstate inmates released through mandatory parole almost always have a higher success rate than inmates released by a parole board