The Founders of our national governmentGroup of answer choiceshad little confidence in the ability of ordinary citizens to lead the government.had more confidence in the mass public than contemporary public opinion scholars.encouraged democratic institutions like the House of Representatives to control less democratic ones like the Senate.tried to develop a system that would allow ordinary citizens to control much of the government.
Question
The Founders of our national governmentGroup of answer choiceshad little confidence in the ability of ordinary citizens to lead the government.had more confidence in the mass public than contemporary public opinion scholars.encouraged democratic institutions like the House of Representatives to control less democratic ones like the Senate.tried to develop a system that would allow ordinary citizens to control much of the government.
Solution
The Founders of our national government had little confidence in the ability of ordinary citizens to lead the government. They believed that a strong central government led by educated and experienced individuals was necessary for the nation's survival. This is why they established a representative democracy, where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, rather than a direct democracy, where citizens make decisions directly.
They also tried to balance power between different branches and levels of government to prevent any one group from gaining too much control. This is evident in the creation of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House, where members are elected directly by the people, was designed to be more responsive to popular will. The Senate, where members were originally chosen by state legislatures, was designed to be a more deliberative body insulated from the passions of the moment.
So, while the Founders did create democratic institutions like the House of Representatives, they also put in place checks and balances to control these institutions and prevent them from becoming too powerful. They did not, however, design a system that would allow ordinary citizens to control much of the government. They believed that such a system would be too unstable and susceptible to mob rule.
Similar Questions
Which of these highlights a flaw that existed in the direct democracy system? Group of answer choices Its scope was limited by constitutional protection of individual rights It was time-consuming, expensive and over-complex All members of the community participated in decision-making. Members only chose their representatives, and not the leader directly
According to lecture, the founding fathers shortly after the revolution were heavily concerned with virtuosity of the American people?Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that Group of answer choicesa government that always follows the will of the people is doomed to fail.the Greek city-state was the best example of procedural democracy.representative democracy is most practical when the government guarantees many freedoms.without a written constitution, a majority of people will take advantage of minorities.true democracy requires people to make their own decisions.
after the revolution the founding fathers wanted build a constitution that integrated church and state?Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
President John Adams publicly indicated thatMultiple Choicethe federal government would not use force against common people that were simply seeking their inalienable rights.the Constitution was designed for a governing elite.dissent against the federal government would be welcomed as part of the birthing pangs of a republic.he disagreed with the concept of a republic and preferred more direct democratic rule.he felt he was the president of the "common folk."
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.