Finland has intensified its military cooperation with other Nordic countries and the United States. In polls, more than half of citizens say they want a referendum on joining NATO. How do you comment?AYou say that the parliament decides on applying for NATO membership based on the government's proposal.BYou demand the organization of a referendum on NATO membership in accordance with the requirement of the constitution.CYou note that Sweden and Finland have agreed to form a common NATO position, before either makes a possible decision on applying for the military alliance

As a study assistant, I can provide an analysis of the situation, but I don't have personal opinions. Here's how I would comment on each point:

A) It's true that the decision to apply for NATO membership is typically a parliamentary one, based on a proposal from the government. This process ensures that the decision is made by elected representatives who are expected to consider the best interests of the country.

B) The demand for a referendum on NATO membership indicates a desire for direct democracy, where citizens have a say in major decisions. However, the constitution of a country would determine whether a referendum is required or even possible.

C) The agreement between Sweden and Finland to form a common NATO position before applying for membership suggests a strategic approach. By aligning their positions, they may be able to negotiate more effectively with NATO and other member countries.

In conclusion, the intensification of military cooperation with other Nordic countries and the US, along with the public's interest in a NATO membership referendum, indicates a shift in Finland's foreign policy and security strategy. However, the final decision would depend on various factors, including constitutional requirements, parliamentary approval, and regional cooperation.