When technology is chosen instead of humans, there are often between competing interests such as police administration and police unions.

When technology is chosen over humans, conflicts often arise between competing interests such as police administration and police unions. Here's a step-by-step breakdown:

1. Introduction of Technology: The first step is the introduction of new technology. This could be anything from automated systems, artificial intelligence, or other tech tools that could potentially replace human labor.

2. Reaction from Police Administration: The police administration, who are responsible for managing resources and operations, might see this as a positive change. Technology can increase efficiency, reduce costs, and potentially improve the quality of service.

3. Reaction from Police Unions: On the other hand, police unions, which represent the interests of the police workforce, might oppose this change. They could argue that replacing human labor with technology could lead to job losses, dehumanization of the service, or other negative impacts on their members.

4. Conflict: The differing interests and reactions of these two groups can lead to conflict. The police administration might push for the adoption of the new technology, while the police unions resist this change.

5. Resolution: The final step is resolution. This could involve negotiations, compromises, or even legal action. The outcome could range from full adoption of the technology, to partial adoption with certain conditions, or rejection of the technology.

In conclusion, the choice of technology over humans in policing can lead to conflicts between the police administration and police unions due to their competing interests.