Fiscal policy is more effective whenCorrect! the marginal propensity to consume is high the marginal propensity to consume is low a fiscal expansion is followed by a monetary contraction a fiscal expansion is followed by an interest rate hike
Question
Fiscal policy is more effective whenCorrect! the marginal propensity to consume is high the marginal propensity to consume is low a fiscal expansion is followed by a monetary contraction a fiscal expansion is followed by an interest rate hike
Solution
Fiscal policy is like a tool that the government uses to try and control the economy. It's like the captain of a ship adjusting the sails to try and catch the wind just right.
The term 'marginal propensity to consume' is a fancy way of saying how much people spend when they get extra money. If the marginal propensity to consume is high, it means that when people get more money, they spend a lot of it. This is like if you got 9 of it on a new book.
Fiscal policy is more effective when the marginal propensity to consume is high because when the government changes its spending or taxes to put more money in people's pockets, they will spend a lot of it. This spending helps businesses, which can then hire more people and pay them, which means those people have more money to spend, and so on. It's like a positive cycle that helps the economy grow.
On the other hand, if the marginal propensity to consume is low, it means that when people get more money, they don't spend much of it. Instead, they might save it or invest it. This is like if you got 9 of it for later. In this case, fiscal policy is less effective because even if the government puts more money in people's pockets, it doesn't lead to as much spending and the positive cycle I mentioned before doesn't kick off as strongly.
The other parts of your question are about what happens when the government increases its spending (a fiscal expansion) and then the central bank does something. The central bank can either reduce the amount of money in the economy (a monetary contraction) or increase interest rates. Both of these actions by the central bank can make fiscal policy less effective.
This is like if you're trying to fill a bucket with water (the government spending more money), but someone is either taking water out of the bucket at the same time (monetary contraction) or making it harder for you to get water into the bucket (increasing interest rates). In both cases, it's harder for the government to achieve its goal of stimulating the economy.
Similar Questions
The government decreases taxes by $100 million amidst high unemployment. Additionally, the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is found to be lower than previously estimated. This implies the _____ fiscal policy, becomes _____ effective. contractionary, more expansionary, more contractionary, less expansionary, less expansionary, equally
Fiscal policy is more effective whenGroup of answer choices
Which of the following is an example of discretionary fiscal policy? Government builds more hospitals as the population ages. An increase in total unemployment benefit payments during a recession due to rising unemployment. An increase in corporate tax collection during an expansion because of more sales. A decrease in total unemployment benefit payments during expansion due to increasing employment. An increase in the interest rate.
When the economy is overheating and experiencing high inflation, contractionary fiscal policy aims to: A. Increase government spending to boost aggregate demand B. Reduce taxes to encourage consumer spending C. Decrease government spending and increase taxes to reduce aggregate demand D. Lower interest rates to encourage borrowing and investment
Government expenditure is more effective in economies when _______
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.