A, with a violence in her eyes, intimidated her husband B to sell his exclusiveproperty to her. The contract to sell is*1 pointvoidvoidableunenforceablerescissible

Based on the given scenario, it appears that A, with a violent demeanor, coerced her husband B into selling his exclusive property to her. Now, let's analyze the contract to determine its legal status:

1. Void: A contract is considered void when it lacks legal validity from the beginning. This could be due to various reasons, such as illegality or impossibility. However, based on the information provided, it does not seem that the contract is void.

2. Voidable: A contract is considered voidable when one party has the option to either enforce or rescind the contract due to certain circumstances, such as fraud, duress, or undue influence. In this case, A's use of intimidation and violence could potentially make the contract voidable.

3. Unenforceable: A contract is deemed unenforceable when it cannot be enforced by a court of law due to technicalities or legal requirements not being met. However, without further information, it is difficult to determine if the contract falls under this category.

4. Rescissible: A contract is rescissible when it can be canceled or annulled by one or both parties due to certain legal grounds, such as fraud, mistake, or undue influence. Given the circumstances of A intimidating B, it is possible that the contract could be rescissible.

Based on the information provided, it is likely that the contract to sell the exclusive property from B to A could be considered voidable or rescissible due to A's use of intimidation and violence. However, it is important to consult with a legal professional to fully assess the situation and determine the appropriate legal course of action.