Which detail from "The City Without Us" most clearly shows that nature is more powerful than it appears?A.The ocean waves that threaten to break the levees around New York CityB.The diseases and fungi that infect the trees in the New York Botanical GardenC.The hurricanes that frequently pummel U.S. coastal citiesD.The great size of the trees that grow in the New York Botanical GardenSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Question
Which detail from "The City Without Us" most clearly shows that nature is more powerful than it appears?A.The ocean waves that threaten to break the levees around New York CityB.The diseases and fungi that infect the trees in the New York Botanical GardenC.The hurricanes that frequently pummel U.S. coastal citiesD.The great size of the trees that grow in the New York Botanical GardenSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Solution
The detail from "The City Without Us" that most clearly shows that nature is more powerful than it appears is A. The ocean waves that threaten to break the levees around New York City. This detail shows the immense power of nature as it threatens to overcome man-made structures designed to contain it.
Similar Questions
Read this excerpt from Alan Weisman's "The City Without Us":"When this pump facility shuts down," says [Paul] Schuber, "in half an hour water reaches a level where trains can't pass anymore."Which claim does the excerpt most clearly support?A.Without humanity's presence, New York City would quickly deteriorate.B.Natural disasters will ultimately lead to humanity's downfall.C.The human impact on the environment is permanent.D.Cities provide ecosystems just like forests and deserts.
Read this passage from "The City Without Us":The notion that someday nature could swallow whole something so colossal and concrete as a modern city doesn't slide easily into our imaginations. The sheer titanic presence of a New York City resists efforts to picture it wasting away. The events of September 2001 showed only what human beings with explosive hardware can do, not crude processes like erosion or rot. . . . Nevertheless, the time it would take nature to rid itself of what urbanity has wrought may be less than we might suspect.Why does the author most likely emphasize the size of New York City?A.To contrast the city with the much smaller ecosystems that existed before itB.To show that it's actually quite small compared to nature and the ecosystemC.To imply that New York City comprises its own self-contained ecosystemD.To suggest that humanity's mark on the environment is irreversibleSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
If all the people in New York City were to disappear, what force of nature would cause the most damage to the city's infrastructure?A.WaterB.Invasive plantsC.Soil erosionD.WindSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Which claim would Alan Weisman most likely agree with?A.New York City lacks a viable ecosystem for supporting life.B.Nature is more powerful than it at first appears.C.People have almost no real effect on the environment.D.Nature will never recover from humanity's destructiveness.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Which situation is the clearest example of cause and effect in "The City Without Us"?A.Water in Manhattan's underground spaces has to be pumped out daily.B.Some time in the next 100,000 years, glaciers will cover all of Manhattan.C.If flooding were to go unchecked, steel support beams in buildings would rust.D.While suspension bridges will last a few centuries, truss bridges may last 1,000 years.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.