Biological theorists explain language acquisition as a process that is controlled by biological forces capable of being observed. They cite a biological imperative for humans to develop language, which is observed in the spontaneous creation of languages by groups of people who had not had previous contact but who came to live in proximity to each other. These languages become more complex over time, as children within the communities are exposed to it and generate more complex forms. The form these languages take initially are those of pidgin languages, or languages that contain simple subject and action words. As the groups share more time together, the languages evolve into creole, a more complex language with more complicated structures, such as verb form variations.This evolution has also been seen among a community of deaf children who began living together in 1990 and who formed a signed language system within their community. Over time, the language grew more complex; however, older children in the community had significant difficulty incorporating the more complicated language structure.Even languages that have been spontaneously generated share common language structures across settings, despite the lack of contact between people in these settings. This suggests that there is an aspect of language which is common to all people. Researchers commissioned a study to examine sign language complexity in the deaf children who lived together. The number of unique syntactic constructions is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1 Number of unique syntactic constructions in a group using sign language, compared between ages at ten-year intervalsThere is also evidence that language ability is heritable. Twin studies found that about 50% of the overall variance in language may be genetic. In particular, syntactic language was found to be strongly hereditary, while vocabulary knowledge was weakly hereditary. Verbal ability scores of children were compared to their sibling or their twin and plotted in Figure 2.Figure 2 Correlation of verbal ability between siblings (Top) and twins (Bottom) Question 31Which of the following, if true, would weaken one of the arguments made in the passage? A.The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing twins’ verbal measure scores.B.The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing siblings' verbal measure scores.C.There was a statistically significant difference between age groups and the number of syntactic constructions in 1990.D.There was a statistically significant difference in the overall number of syntactic constructions between years across all age groups
Question
Biological theorists explain language acquisition as a process that is controlled by biological forces capable of being observed. They cite a biological imperative for humans to develop language, which is observed in the spontaneous creation of languages by groups of people who had not had previous contact but who came to live in proximity to each other. These languages become more complex over time, as children within the communities are exposed to it and generate more complex forms. The form these languages take initially are those of pidgin languages, or languages that contain simple subject and action words. As the groups share more time together, the languages evolve into creole, a more complex language with more complicated structures, such as verb form variations.This evolution has also been seen among a community of deaf children who began living together in 1990 and who formed a signed language system within their community. Over time, the language grew more complex; however, older children in the community had significant difficulty incorporating the more complicated language structure.Even languages that have been spontaneously generated share common language structures across settings, despite the lack of contact between people in these settings. This suggests that there is an aspect of language which is common to all people. Researchers commissioned a study to examine sign language complexity in the deaf children who lived together. The number of unique syntactic constructions is shown in Figure 1.Figure 1 Number of unique syntactic constructions in a group using sign language, compared between ages at ten-year intervalsThere is also evidence that language ability is heritable. Twin studies found that about 50% of the overall variance in language may be genetic. In particular, syntactic language was found to be strongly hereditary, while vocabulary knowledge was weakly hereditary. Verbal ability scores of children were compared to their sibling or their twin and plotted in Figure 2.Figure 2 Correlation of verbal ability between siblings (Top) and twins (Bottom) Question 31Which of the following, if true, would weaken one of the arguments made in the passage? A.The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing twins’ verbal measure scores.B.The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing siblings' verbal measure scores.C.There was a statistically significant difference between age groups and the number of syntactic constructions in 1990.D.There was a statistically significant difference in the overall number of syntactic constructions between years across all age groups
Solution
The argument in the passage that could be weakened by one of the options provided is the claim that language ability is heritable. This argument is supported by the evidence from twin studies that found about 50% of the overall variance in language may be genetic.
Option A: "The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing twins’ verbal measure scores." This statement, if true, would weaken the argument that language ability is heritable. The R-squared value is a statistical measure that represents the proportion of the variance for a dependent variable that's explained by an independent variable. In this case, if the R-squared value is not statistically significant, it means that the correlation between the twins' verbal measure scores is not strong enough to support the claim that language ability is heritable.
Option B: "The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing siblings' verbal measure scores." This statement, if true, would not necessarily weaken the argument that language ability is heritable. Siblings share only about 50% of their genes, so a low R-squared value in this case would not be as damaging to the argument as a low R-squared value in the case of twins, who share 100% of their genes.
Option C: "There was a statistically significant difference between age groups and the number of syntactic constructions in 1990." This statement, if true, would not weaken any of the arguments made in the passage. The passage does not make any claims about the relationship between age and the number of syntactic constructions.
Option D: "There was a statistically significant difference in the overall number of syntactic constructions between years across all age groups." This statement, if true, would not weaken any of the arguments made in the passage. The passage does not make any claims about the relationship between the number of syntactic constructions and time.
Therefore, the correct answer is A: "The R-squared value was not statistically significant in the chart comparing twins’ verbal measure scores."
Similar Questions
As is discussed in "Investigating Life 7.1: Clues to the Origin of Language," which of the following represents how language evolved in human ancestors?Multiple ChoiceThrough repeated use of language, humans developed areas of their brain used for communication. This led to changesin transcription factors and genes that were inherited by future generations.Two random mutations in DNA resulted in a modified transcription factor that participates in language acquisition.Individuals with the mutations reproduced more successfully.Individuals realized that communication with others of the same species would increase their survival. They developedlanguage skills and passed them on to their offspring.
ill in the Blank QuestionFill in the blank question.The approach to language development proposes that there is an innate mechanism that directs language development in humans.
8Over time, languages change as influenced by societal shifts, cultural contact, and generational transmission. This transformation in human communication is known as Language evolution. For example, Old English transforming into Modern English involved significant shifts in vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation. Languages adapt to capture cultural nuances and express evolving concepts. Creole languages, born from diverse linguistic influences, illustrate the intricate process of language creation. Exploring language evolution reveals a dynamic system reflecting the changing nature of societies and the intricate tapestry of human expression.8 Mark For Review8According to the text, what is not true about Language evolution?A) The shift from Old English to Modern English involved the creation of a new language.B) Cultural evolution adapts to include new ideas and concepts brought about by adopting a second language.C) Creole languages properly illustrate how language changes are driven by different linguistic differences.D) Language evolves over time, optimizing itself and removing obsolete expressions.
The __________ approach to language acquisition posits that people are born with the innate capacity to use language, which emerges as they mature.
DescriptionThe passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries.Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.The dominant hypotheses in modern science believe that language evolved to allow humans to exchange factual information about the physical world. But an alternative view is that language evolved, in modern humans at least, to facilitate social bonding. It increased our ancestors’ chances of survival by enabling them to hunt more successfully or to cooperate more extensively. Language meant that things could be explained and that plans and past experiences could be shared efficiently.Please select your Answer.From the belief that humans invented language to process factual information, scholars now think that language was the outcome of the need to ensure social cohesion and thus human survival.Since its origin, language has been continuously evolving to higher forms, from being used to identify objects to ensuring human survival by enabling our ancestors to bond and cooperate.Most believe that language originated from a need to articulate facts, but others think it emerged from the need to promote social cohesion and cooperation, thus enabling human survival.Experts are challenging the narrow view of the origin of language, as being merely used to describe facts and label objects, to being necessary to promote more complex interactions among humans.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.