This question requires a detailed comparison and contrast of the New Rules of Measurement (NRM2) developed by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in 2013 and the Standard Methods of Measurement (SMM) developed by East African countries.

1. Origin and Development:
The NRM2 was developed by the RICS, a professional body that accredits professionals within the land, property, construction, and infrastructure sectors worldwide. The RICS is based in the UK but operates globally. On the other hand, the SMM was developed by East African countries, indicating a regional focus.

2. Purpose and Application:
The NRM2 was developed to provide a consistent, standardized approach to the cost management of construction projects. It is applicable to the capital and operational costs of a building project. The SMM, on the other hand, was developed for similar reasons but is specifically tailored to the needs and conditions of East African countries.

3. Structure and Content:
The NRM2 is divided into two parts: rules for detailed measurement and rules for approximate quantities. It provides a detailed method for the quantification of building works. The SMM, while also providing a method for quantifying building works, may have a different structure and content that reflects the specific needs and conditions of East African countries.

4. Adoption and Use:
The NRM2, given the global reach of the RICS, is likely to be adopted and used internationally. The SMM, being developed by East African countries, is likely to be adopted and used primarily in those countries.

5. Updates and Revisions:
The NRM2 was developed in 2013, replacing the previous standard, the Standard Method of Measurement (SMM7). This suggests that the RICS regularly updates its standards. The frequency and nature of updates to the SMM by East African countries would need to be investigated.

In conclusion, while both the NRM2 and the SMM serve similar purposes in providing a method for the measurement of building works, they differ in their origin, development, structure, content, adoption, use, and updates.

Question

This question requires a detailed comparison and contrast of the New Rules of Measurement (NRM2) developed by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in 2013 and the Standard Methods of Measurement (SMM) developed by East African countries.

1. Origin and Development: 
The NRM2 was developed by the RICS, a professional body that accredits professionals within the land, property, construction, and infrastructure sectors worldwide. The RICS is based in the UK but operates globally. On the other hand, the SMM was developed by East African countries, indicating a regional focus.

2. Purpose and Application: 
The NRM2 was developed to provide a consistent, standardized approach to the cost management of construction projects. It is applicable to the capital and operational costs of a building project. The SMM, on the other hand, was developed for similar reasons but is specifically tailored to the needs and conditions of East African countries.

3. Structure and Content: 
The NRM2 is divided into two parts: rules for detailed measurement and rules for approximate quantities. It provides a detailed method for the quantification of building works. The SMM, while also providing a method for quantifying building works, may have a different structure and content that reflects the specific needs and conditions of East African countries.

4. Adoption and Use: 
The NRM2, given the global reach of the RICS, is likely to be adopted and used internationally. The SMM, being developed by East African countries, is likely to be adopted and used primarily in those countries.

5. Updates and Revisions: 
The NRM2 was developed in 2013, replacing the previous standard, the Standard Method of Measurement (SMM7). This suggests that the RICS regularly updates its standards. The frequency and nature of updates to the SMM by East African countries would need to be investigated.

In conclusion, while both the NRM2 and the SMM serve similar purposes in providing a method for the measurement of building works, they differ in their origin, development, structure, content, adoption, use, and updates.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

This question requires a detailed comparison and contrast of the New Rules of Measurement (NRM2) developed by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in 2013 and the Standard Methods of Measurement (SMM) developed by East African countries.

1. Origin and Development: 
The NRM2 was developed by the RICS, a professional body that accredits professionals within the land, property, construction, and infrastructure sectors worldwide. The RICS is based in the UK but operates globally. On the other hand, the SMM was developed by East African countries, indicating a regional focus.

2. Purpose and Application: 
The NRM2 was developed to provide a consistent, standardized approach to the cost management of construction projects. It is applicable to the capital and operational costs of a building project. The SMM, on the other hand, was developed for similar reasons but is specifically tailored to the needs and conditions of East African countries.

3. Structure and Content: 
The NRM2 is divided into two parts: rules for detailed measurement and rules for approximate quantities. It provides a detailed method for the quantification of building works. The SMM, while also providing a method for quantifying building works, may have a different structure and content that reflects the specific needs and conditions of East African countries.

4. Adoption and Use: 
The NRM2, given the global reach of the RICS, is likely to be adopted and used internationally. The SMM, being developed by East African countries, is likely to be adopted and used primarily in those countries.

5. Updates and Revisions: 
The NRM2 was developed in 2013, replacing the previous standard, the Standard Method of Measurement (SMM7). This suggests that the RICS regularly updates its standards. The frequency and nature of updates to the SMM by East African countries would need to be investigated.

In conclusion, while both the NRM2 and the SMM serve similar purposes in providing a method for the measurement of building works, they differ in their origin, development, structure, content, adoption, use, and updates.

New rules of measurement (2) was developed by the Royal institute of chartered surveyors in 2013 whereas the Standard methods of measurement for was developed by the East African countries. Compare and contrast the two authorities as applicable in measurement of building works. (50 marks)

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee