In his essay “Of the Standard of Taste”, David Hume “says that it is natural for us to seek a standard of taste” despite the immense variety of taste. For Hume "the taste of all individuals is not upon an equal footing, and that some men in general, however difficult to be particularly pitched upon, will be acknowledged by universal sentiment to have a preference above others” (p.18). How does Hume seek to reconcile the variety of taste amongst men into a universally accepted standard?
Question
In his essay “Of the Standard of Taste”, David Hume “says that it is natural for us to seek a standard of taste” despite the immense variety of taste. For Hume "the taste of all individuals is not upon an equal footing, and that some men in general, however difficult to be particularly pitched upon, will be acknowledged by universal sentiment to have a preference above others” (p.18). How does Hume seek to reconcile the variety of taste amongst men into a universally accepted standard?
Solution
Hume seeks to reconcile the variety of taste amongst men into a universally accepted standard by proposing several criteria that can be used to evaluate and judge works of art. He argues that there are certain qualities that are universally agreeable and can be used as a basis for determining the standard of taste.
Firstly, Hume suggests that the judgment of taste should be based on sentiments rather than reason. He believes that our emotions and feelings play a crucial role in determining our preferences and judgments of beauty. Therefore, he argues that a work of art should evoke a certain sentiment or emotion in order to be considered of good taste.
Secondly, Hume proposes that the judgment of taste should be based on the sentiments of the "true judges." He argues that there are individuals who possess a superior sense of taste and are more capable of making accurate judgments. These individuals, according to Hume, have a more refined and delicate sensibility that allows them to perceive and appreciate the finer qualities of art. Their judgments are considered more reliable and can serve as a guide for others.
Furthermore, Hume suggests that the judgment of taste should be based on the consensus of the "true judges." He argues that although individual tastes may vary, there is a general agreement among the true judges regarding the merits of a work of art. This consensus can be seen as a reflection of the universal standard of taste.
Lastly, Hume acknowledges that there will always be differences in taste among individuals, but he argues that these differences can be attributed to factors such as education, culture, and personal experiences. He suggests that by exposing oneself to a variety of art forms and engaging in critical discussions, one can refine their taste and approach closer to the universally accepted standard.
In summary, Hume seeks to reconcile the variety of taste amongst men into a universally accepted standard by emphasizing the role of sentiments, the judgment of the true judges, the consensus among the true judges, and the potential for refinement through exposure and critical engagement.
Similar Questions
Write a critical note on Hume's Essay on Taste in 400 words.
What does the old saying "Matters of taste are not disputable" imply?Multiple choice question.Sometimes it is more important to be human than it is to have good taste.Beauty is produced by the pleasing appearance and good taste of an individual.There is no accounting for what people like in the arts, for beauty is in the eye of the beholder.Genuine good taste consists of saying much in few words, having order, and speaking with composure.
Which of the following sayings can be credited with making an individual feel righteous about his or her own taste in art?Multiple choice question.Matters of taste are not disputable.correctThe only tastes worth having are acquired tastes.It is not a bad form to change one's tastes.Bad taste is simply saying the truth before it should be said.
Which of the following sayings can be credited with making an individual feel righteous about his or her own taste in art?Multiple choice question.Matters of taste are not disputable.The only tastes worth having are acquired tastes.It is not a bad form to change one's tastes.Bad taste is simply saying the truth before it should be said.
Hume claimed theism makes the best sense overallGroup of answer choicesTrueFalse
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.