Which of the following are naturally occurring sources of radiation? Select all that apply.Group of answer choicesRadon gas, a daughter nuclei of the decay of Uranium-238Radioactive isotopes ingested in food and drink, and incorporated into our tissuesGamma rays from the earth's crust and building materialsRadioactive fallout from nuclear weaponsCosmic radiation from outer spaceEnvironmental pollutionExposure from X-rays and radionuclides for medical diagnosis and treatment
Question
Which of the following are naturally occurring sources of radiation? Select all that apply.Group of answer choicesRadon gas, a daughter nuclei of the decay of Uranium-238Radioactive isotopes ingested in food and drink, and incorporated into our tissuesGamma rays from the earth's crust and building materialsRadioactive fallout from nuclear weaponsCosmic radiation from outer spaceEnvironmental pollutionExposure from X-rays and radionuclides for medical diagnosis and treatment
Solution
The naturally occurring sources of radiation from the given options are:
- Radon gas, a daughter nuclei of the decay of Uranium-238
- Radioactive isotopes ingested in food and drink, and incorporated into our tissues
- Gamma rays from the earth's crust and building materials
- Cosmic radiation from outer space
The other options like radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons, environmental pollution, and exposure from X-rays and radionuclides for medical diagnosis and treatment are not naturally occurring sources of radiation. They are man-made or anthropogenic sources of radiation.
Similar Questions
What are the different sources of radiation in our daily lives?
Radiation occurs from three natural sources: radioactive material in the environment, such as in soil, rock, or building materials; cosmic rays; and substances in the human body, such as radioactive potassium in bone and radioactive carbon in tissues. These natural sources account for an exposure of about 100 millirems a year for the average American.The largest single source of man-made radiation is medical X rays, yet most scientists agree that hazards from this source are not as great as those from weapons test fallout, since strontium 90 and carbon 14 become incorporated into the body, hence delivering radiation for an entire lifetime. The issue is, however, by no means uncontroversial. The last two decades have witnessed intensified examination and dispute about the effects of low-level radiation, beginning with the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, which reported in 1958 that “even the smallest amounts of radiation are likely to cause deleterious genetic and perhaps also somatic effects ).”A survey conducted in Britain confirmed that an abnormally high percentage of patients suffering from arthritis of the spine who had been treated with X rays contracted cancer. Another study revealed a high incidence of childhood cancer in cases where the mother had been given prenatal pelvic X rays. These studies have pointed to the need to reexamine the assumption that exposure to low-linear energy transfer , ) presents only a minor risk.Recently, examination of the death certificates of former employees of a West Coast plant that produces plutonium for nuclear weapons revealed markedly higher rates for cancers of the pancreas, lung, bone marrow , and lymphatic system than would have been expected in a normal population.While the National Academy of Sciences committee attributes this difference to chemical or other environmental causes rather than radiation, other scientists maintain that any radiation exposure, no matter how small, leads to an increase in cancer risk. It is believed by some that a dose of one rem, if sustained over many generations, would lead to an increase of 1 percent in the number of serious genetic defects at birth, a possible increase of 1,000 disorders per million births.In the meantime, regulatory efforts have been disorganized, fragmented, inconsistent, and characterized by internecine strife and bureaucratic delays. A Senate report concluded that coordination of regulation among involved departments and agencies was not possible because of jurisdictional disputes and confusion. One federal agency has been unsuccessful in its efforts to obtain sufficient funding and manpower for the enforcement of existing radiation laws, and the chairperson of a panel especially created to develop a coordinated federal program has resigned.QUESTION 13bookmark_borderSelect the correct answerThe passage contains information that answers which of the following questions?radio_button_uncheckedHow many millirems of radiation from man-made sources is the average American exposed to each year?radio_button_uncheckedIs exposure to radiation linked to any other diseases besides cancer?radio_button_uncheckedHow many types of radiation are there?radio_button_uncheckedWhat is the maximum level of radiation to which humans can safely be exposed?radio_button_uncheckedWhy is exposure to the fallout from weapons testing considered by some to be more hazardous than exposure to X rays?
Some of the main sources of radioactivity we encounter in everyday life areGroup of answer choicesfood.other people.the cosmos.the earth.air.
Which of these radiations are ionising? Select all that apply.Group of answer choicesRadio wavesInfrared radiationX-raysUltrasoundBeta ParticlesAlpha particlesGamma rays
6. Who among the following discovered Radioactivity?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.