Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Select the statement(s) that accurately support the need for repetition in the scientific investigation about whether rockets with three fins fly straighter than rockets with four fins.A gust of wind could push one of the rockets off course.Conducting multiple trials takes more time and effort.The investigator may not put the rocket on the launcher correctly.Multiple trials using both rockets will help eliminate random results.Launching a rocket several times increases the chance of losing the rocket when it is in the air.Preview

Question

Select the statement(s) that accurately support the need for repetition in the scientific investigation about whether rockets with three fins fly straighter than rockets with four fins.A gust of wind could push one of the rockets off course.Conducting multiple trials takes more time and effort.The investigator may not put the rocket on the launcher correctly.Multiple trials using both rockets will help eliminate random results.Launching a rocket several times increases the chance of losing the rocket when it is in the air.Preview

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The statements that accurately support the need for repetition in the scientific investigation about whether rockets with three fins fly straighter than rockets with four fins are:

  1. "A gust of wind could push one of the rockets off course." This statement supports the need for repetition because external factors like wind can affect the trajectory of the rockets. By repeating the experiment, the investigator can ensure that the results are not due to these random occurrences.

  2. "The investigator may not put the rocket on the launcher correctly." This statement supports the need for repetition because human error can affect the results of the experiment. By repeating the experiment, the investigator can minimize the impact of these errors.

  3. "Multiple trials using both rockets will help eliminate random results." This statement directly supports the need for repetition in scientific investigation. By conducting multiple trials, the investigator can average the results, which helps to eliminate outliers and provide a more accurate conclusion.

The other statements do not directly support the need for repetition in the scientific investigation.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

A student is timing how long it takes to get to school each day and wants to see if changing their breakfast food makes a difference. Each day they use a different form of transport. Just to be safe, they repeat the trial four times.Explain why four repeat trials won't make this investigation reliable.

Drag and drop the words or phrases that accurately complete the summary.When a scientist designs an experiment to find the answer to a question, they follow certain scientific to ensure the results are .One of these is to perform multiple trials in their experiment to help eliminate the effects of random occurrences. This is referred to as .Another scientist may read about the experiment and decide to reproduce it to see if they get the same results. This is an example of . If the second scientist gets the same or similar results, this adds even more reliability to the first scientist's investigation.replicationstandardsreliablereportscientistresultrocketrepetition

In one paragraph, explain Why would repeating experiment increase reliability

Why do we do multiple trials of the same experiment under the same conditions using the same test subject?

Which of the following is an accurate statement about replication?There is no advantage to replicating an experiment more than once.The more times that scientists replicate an experiment, the more reliable the results of that experiment.When another scientist replicates an experiment, the results must match the first experiment.Conducting multiple trials in one experiment is replication.Preview

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.