The Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland ensured that:A.it remained unclear whether a state law could contradict a federal one.B.states did not have the power to tax citizens or businesses within their states.C.states could operate their own banks without interference from the federal government.D.a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the Constitution.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

What is one result of the Supreme Court's decision in the McCulloch v. Maryland case?A.The federal government could declare a state law illegal if it went against the Constitution.B.State governments gained the power to operate their own banks without the approval of the federal government.C.The federal government gained the power to tax, which was something only the states had been allowed to do.D.State governments gained the power to submit amendments to the Constitution.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

What did the Supreme Court decide in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)?Multiple select question.National law overrides state law.The necessary and proper clause implies the power to establish a national bank.The national bank is within Congress's power to create, but Maryland has the power to tax it.Congress cannot establish a national bank because that falls outside its enumerated powers.

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland addressed the constitutionality of what institution/entity?Multiple choice question.the Second Bank of the United Statesprivate university chartersNew York State's steamboat monopolythe ninth federal judicial circuit

Supreme Court rulings such as Fletcher vs. Peck and McCulloch vs. Maryland supported

The supremacy clause of the Constitution forbids:A.states from passing laws that contradict federal law.B.the federal government from interfering with the operations of state government.C.a government employee from working for the state and federal governments at the same time.D.the Constitution from being amended without a formal process.