Looking at the Discussion section in Sundstrom et al.: in Northern European countries ('Type C' countries) the impact of threats to agricultural output is assessed to be small, because Group of answer choicesclimate change will improve agricultural output in these countriesthese countries have the resources to mitigate against negative impactsthese countries don't have much agricultural output to begin withthese countries mostly have livestockthese countries can import food if they need to
Question
Looking at the Discussion section in Sundstrom et al.: in Northern European countries ('Type C' countries) the impact of threats to agricultural output is assessed to be small, because Group of answer choicesclimate change will improve agricultural output in these countriesthese countries have the resources to mitigate against negative impactsthese countries don't have much agricultural output to begin withthese countries mostly have livestockthese countries can import food if they need to
Solution
Without the specific context of the Sundstrom et al. study, it's difficult to provide an accurate answer. However, based on the given options, the impact of threats to agricultural output in Northern European countries ('Type C' countries) could be assessed to be small due to several potential reasons:
-
Climate change will improve agricultural output in these countries: If the study suggests that the effects of climate change (such as warmer temperatures or increased rainfall) could potentially benefit the agricultural output in these countries, this could be the reason.
-
These countries have the resources to mitigate against negative impacts: If these countries have sufficient technological, financial, and infrastructural resources, they might be able to effectively mitigate the potential negative impacts on their agricultural output.
-
These countries don't have much agricultural output to begin with: If agriculture does not constitute a significant part of these countries' economies, threats to agricultural output might not have a significant impact.
-
These countries mostly have livestock: If these countries primarily rely on livestock rather than crops, they might be less vulnerable to threats to agricultural output.
-
These countries can import food if they need to: If these countries have strong trade relationships and the financial means to import food, they might be less vulnerable to threats to agricultural output.
Without the specific context of the study, it's impossible to determine which of these options is the most accurate.
Similar Questions
Factors Affecting Agricultural Economics
What was one of the main objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy?Group of answer choicesStabilize agricultural marketsAll answers are correctDecrease inequality between urban and rural areas in EuropeIncrease agricultural productivity
From what we have seen and read, the high-yield agriculture model that currently dominates in the U.S. is necessary to provide enough food to lower-income countries that cannot grow enough of their own food.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
impact of globalisation on agriculture
From what we have seen and read, the long-term, large-scale trend in U.S. agriculture has been toward smaller farms.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.