Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Based off of this information, what conclusions can be made about Rolle's Theorem?This contradicts Rolle's Theorem, since f is differentiable, f(−1) = f(1), and f '(c) = 0 exists, but c is not in (−1, 1).This does not contradict Rolle's Theorem, since f '(0) = 0, and 0 is in the interval (−1, 1).    This contradicts Rolle's Theorem, since f(−1) = f(1), there should exist a number c in (−1, 1) such that f '(c) = 0.This does not contradict Rolle's Theorem, since f '(0) does not exist, and so f is not differentiable on (−1, 1).Nothing can be concluded.

Question

Based off of this information, what conclusions can be made about Rolle's Theorem?This contradicts Rolle's Theorem, since f is differentiable, f(−1) = f(1), and f '(c) = 0 exists, but c is not in (−1, 1).This does not contradict Rolle's Theorem, since f '(0) = 0, and 0 is in the interval (−1, 1).    This contradicts Rolle's Theorem, since f(−1) = f(1), there should exist a number c in (−1, 1) such that f '(c) = 0.This does not contradict Rolle's Theorem, since f '(0) does not exist, and so f is not differentiable on (−1, 1).Nothing can be concluded.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

Based on the information provided, we can conclude that Rolle's Theorem states that if a function f is continuous on a closed interval [a, b], differentiable on the open interval (a, b), and f(a) = f(b), then there exists at least one c in the interval (a, b) such that the derivative f'(c) = 0.

  1. The first statement contradicts Rolle's Theorem because even though f is differentiable and f(-1) = f(1), the value of c where f'(c) = 0 is not within the interval (-1, 1).

  2. The second statement does not contradict Rolle's Theorem. The function's derivative at 0 is 0, and 0 is within the interval (-1, 1).

  3. The third statement contradicts Rolle's Theorem. Even though f(-1) = f(1), there is no c in the interval (-1, 1) where f'(c) = 0.

  4. The fourth statement does not contradict Rolle's Theorem because the function is not differentiable on the interval (-1, 1), which is a requirement of Rolle's Theorem.

  5. The last statement is incorrect. We can make conclusions about Rolle's Theorem based on the provided information.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Consider the following function.f(x) = 1 − x2/3Find f(−1) and f(1).f(−1)= 0 f(1)= 0 Find all values c in (−1, 1) such that f '(c) = 0. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list. If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.)c = Based off of this information, what conclusions can be made about Rolle's Theorem?This contradicts Rolle's Theorem, since f is differentiable, f(−1) = f(1), and f '(c) = 0 exists, but c is not in (−1, 1).This does not contradict Rolle's Theorem, since f '(0) = 0, and 0 is in the interval (−1, 1).    This contradicts Rolle's Theorem, since f(−1) = f(1), there should exist a number c in (−1, 1) such that f '(c) = 0.This does not contradict Rolle's Theorem, since f '(0) does not exist, and so f is not differentiable on (−1, 1).Nothing can be concluded

Find all values c in (−1, 1) such that f '(c) = 0. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list. If an answer does not exist, enter DNE.)c =

Verify that the function satisfies the three hypotheses of Rolle's theorem on the given interval. Then find all numbers c that satisfy the conclusion of Rolle's theorem. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list.)f(x) = 3x2 − 6x + 4,   [−1, 3]

Rolle's Theorem is valid for the given function f(x)=x3+bx2+cx,1≤x≤2 at the point x= 43, then values of b and c are respectively

Suppose that f : [0, 4] → R is continuous on [0, 4], is differentiable on (0, 4) and thatf (0) = 0, f (1) = 3, f (4) = −3.Show that there exists c ∈ (0, 4) such that f ′(c) = −1

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.