In 1767, colonists organized boycotts and established the first non-importation agreement to reduce British tax revenue in response to which of the following?Athe Intolerable ActsBthe Townshend ActsCthe Tea ActDthe Stamp Act

John Dickinson, Letters From a Pennsylvania FarmerThere is another late act of parliament, which appears to me to be unconstitutional, and..destructive to the liberty of these colonies...The parliament unquestionably possesses a legal authority to regulate the trade of Great Britain, and all her colonies, I have looked over every statute relating to these colonies, from their first settlement to this time, and I find every one of them founded on this principle, till the Stamp Act administration...All before, are calculated to regulate trade...The raising of revenue...was never intended...Never did the British parliament [until the passage of the Stamp Act] think of imposing duties in America for the purpose of raising a revenue. [The Townshend Acts] impose duties on these colonies, not for the regulation of trade...but for the single purpose of levying money upon it.Dickinson, John, and R. T. Haines Halsey. Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies. New York: Outlook, 1903. Print.The passage most clearly reflects the principles developed in which of the following?Elimination ToolSelect one answerAThe Great Awakening.BThe Enlightenment.CThe Second Great Awakening.DThe Progressive Era.

Which of the following was a direct response by the British Parliament to the Boston Tea Party?AThe Treaty of ParisBThe Intolerable Acts of 1774CThe Tea Act of 1773DThe Quartering Act of 1765

This Act made colonists mad because it impacted everyone, not just the richGroup of answer choicesThe Molasses ActThe Stamp ActThe Sugar ActThe Tea Act

The Stamp Act      A:  What did the act do?       B:  How did the colonists respond?

How did the British respond to “No Taxation Without Representation”Group of answer choicesThey argued that the colonial assembly represented the colonies in ParliamentThey argued that the colonists wer e virtually representedThey argued that the colonists had ambassadors to represent them in ParliamentAll of these answers are true