In lecture, a distinction was made between politics in sport and politics on sport. Which question is most relevant for considering how politics on sport?1.Why are governments involved in sport?2.What are the rules of a sport?3.Who makes and enforces the rules in a sport?4.What qualifies as a sport?

debatable issues about the sport and recreation

Which of the following is NOT a definition of politics?Question 13Answera.the activities engaged in by a governmentb.the art or science of governingc.the activities directed towards production d.the total complex of relations between people in a society

There's a tension in sport between its historic roots in community on the one hand and the power of global capitalism on the other. In the former, people created their own sporting life and controlled it. In the latter, large institutions and corporations control sport and it serves more commercial and political ends. Neither the community nor global capital completely defines contemporary sport, but the latter—global capital—has been far more influential and grown in strength in the last half century while community power has diminished.What are the consequences—good and bad—in that historic shift of power over sport? Is serious reform of contemporary sport necessary? Why/why not? If reforms are necessary, what are they and how realistic are the chances of these sorts of reforms becoming reality? Why/why not?Identify a few sports or leagues which you think best illustrate your answer and develop your answer with evidence and specific examples.

In the tapestry of modern society, sport has woven itself as not just a pastime, but as a powerful tool for social, political, and cultural transformation. From the ancient Olympic Games, which sought to bring about peace among warring city-states, to the more recent boycotts and integrations in the 20th century, sports have always been more than just games. They are reflections of societal values, aspirations, and conflicts. “Although the wealthy often used sports to reinforce status distinctions between themselves and other social classes, they also influenced how sports were played and organized by others, especially middle-class people whose status aspirations led them to emulate the rich and powerful.” (Coakley, 2016, pp. 70) It means that social changes are embedded in the development of sports in the United States and worldwide. In essence, the elite class played a pivotal role in setting the standards for sports, influencing the players and the spectators. Their affluence allowed them to shape the perception of sports as a consumer activity, emphasizing the importance of appropriate attire, equipment, and venues. Additionally, they positioned sports as events that were accompanied by specific social rituals, distinct from work and professional settings. As a result, many in society adopted these standards, intertwining sports with the economic fabric. Interestingly, even though sports were often seen as leisure or "non-work" activities, they bore characteristics of both consumption and work, blurring the lines between recreation and the economy.When it comes to modern sports as a tool for social change, I believe sports have been instrumental in promoting gender equality. The push for women's participation in sports, exemplified by events like the Women's World Cup in soccer or the WNBA in basketball, has not only provided women with platforms to showcase their talents but has also challenged traditional gender norms and stereotypes. Billie Jean King's victory over Bobby Riggs in the "Battle of the Sexes" tennis match in 1973 was not just a win in sports but a significant blow to the patriarchal views that doubted women's capabilities.[337 words]

Following which theoretical approach would we understand sports not as a societal system but as an ongoing process of face-to-face interaction?A.symbolic-interaction approachB.structural-functional approachC.social-conflict approachD.social-exchange approach