Which of the following is not a potential problem of using more nuclear energy?A.They can provide a lot of energy for people to useB.The plants might completely melt down and destroy nearby environmentsC.Spent nuclear fuel is dangerous if handled wrongD.Cost to build a nuclear plant is very high

Which of the following is not a potential benefit of using more nuclear energy?A.More air pollutionB.Proper control can ensure safe handlingC.Cost of fuel is very lowD.Fuel is easy to move, so there is less pollution from shipping

So when we consider all the benefits potentially of using nuclear energy, and then we deduct all of the potential limitations of this energy source, where would you come down on? Would it be a good alternative to burning fossil fuels for the foreseeable future? Answer using the statement I don't condone either Im more for natural and solar energy use explinations

Many people who live near nuclear plants are concerned. ---- go wrong, the impact on the surrounding area could be disastrous.Something wouldSomething wouldSomething willShould somethingDoes something

b) What are the downsides of nuclear power?

Which statement BEST explains why nuclear energy might be a preferred energy source over coal if uranium is considered a nonrenewable resource?A Mining uranium is associated with low hazards.B Uranium produces nuclear waste while coal does not.C Uranium produces higher carbon dioxide emissions.D A small amount of uranium produces a larger amount of energy.