When delivering most bad-news messages, you shouldMultiple choice question.give the bad news immediately in a brief messagegive the bad news immediately, followed by a discussion of the options availableease into the bad news to give the recipient time to adjust to the shock.hint at the bad news with the expectation that the recipient will ask what the bad news is.

Multiple Choice QuestionOne important aspect of delivering bad-news messages is toMultiple choice question.choose one trusted channel to convey the message.avoid the urge to discuss the long-term outlook.give the news without waiting too long.tell the news bluntly so it will seem better later.

Multiple Choice QuestionWhich of the following is a recommended guideline for delivering bad news?Multiple choice question.Get to the bad news fairly quickly.Focus less on facts and more on personal connections.Repeatedly explain how you feel bad for the person.Skirt around the bad news to protect the person's feelings.

In delivering bad news, a direct approach is often more suitable.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

Multiple Choice QuestionWhy might you write a bad-news message and then wait to read it again a few days later before sending the message?Multiple choice question.The longer you wait to give people bad news, the more positively they will respond to your message.The wait gives someone else an opportunity to step up and deliver the news so that you do not have to.Strong emotions from your having just learned about the bad news may have influenced the tone you used when writing the message.Most industries require a seven-day confirmation period before information can be released to the public.

What is an advantage of delivering bad news in writing?Multiple ChoiceYou can control the message more carefully, delivering it precisely and accurately.Your news will likely be received more warmly.You can respond immediately if your news is misinterpreted.You will never have to speak about the bad news.You ensure accurate interpretation by recipients.