Would Darwin or Lamarck have agreed with the following statement?"The ancestor of today's anteaters lived among many creatures that ate ants, but the ancestor, through random variation, had a longer tongue and was able to more easily catch ants. It thrived, produced more offspring, and outcompeted the others with shorter tongues."Group of answer choicesLamarckDarwin

Would Darwin or Lamarck have agreed with the following statement?"Anteaters developed long, thin tongues because they are perfect tools to scoop ants out of small cracks or holes in logs or dirt mounds. This feature got longer and longer as an anteater tried to become better and better at catching food."Group of answer choicesDarwinLamarck

Would Darwin or Lamarck have agreed with the following statement?"There were many prehistoric penguins with a variety of characteristics. The penguins with the wings suitable to swimming must have had an advantage and produced more offspring than others."

Would Darwin or Lamarck have agreed with the following statement?"Long ago, there were many different fish, some with bioluminescent lights on their heads and some without who migrated to the depths of the ocean. The fish with bioluminescent lights were better able to attract food and thrived, becoming the ancestors of the lantern fish we have today."

Would Darwin or Lamarck have agreed with the following statement?"A bunch of prehistoric penguins stopped using their wings to fly and the wings shrank from not being used. These penguins with shrunken wings then passed the shrunken wing characteristic to their offspring."Group of answer choicesLamarckDarwin

Would Darwin or Lamarck have agreed with the following statement?"Bacteria grow stronger because they want to grow stronger, as a result "superbugs" are created."Group of answer choicesLamarckDarwin