3. Impacts on a specific factor Describe and summarise one POSITIVE impact of using the science you have described? Must relate to one of the factors (political, economic, social, ethical, moral, cultural, and environmental) Describe and summarise one NEGATIVE impact of using the science? Must relate to one of the factors (political, economic, social, ethical, moral, cultural, and environmental) Factor: Ethical Impact (with evidence): This ethical aspect is important because it ensures the organ is maintained and utilized to its full extent. A report made by the World Health Organization (WHO) highlights the ethical implications of organ preservation in addressing the global shortage of organs for transplants. The report emphasizes the importance of maximizing the use of donated organs through preservation techniques to ensure that every effort is made to save as many lives as possible. Factor: Economic Impact (with evidence): While organ preservation techniques can increase the number of viable organs available for transplant, they can also be costly to implement and maintain. This economic factor can create financial barriers for healthcare systems, transplant centers, and patients, potentially limiting access to organ transplantation for those in need. Some data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) in the United States shows that the total cost of organ transplantation, including pre-transplant evaluation, surgery, post-transplant care, and immunosuppressive medications, can range from 300,000 to 800,000per patient, depending on the type of organ transplanted and etc. The high costs associated with organ transplantation, including organ preservation, can strain healthcare budgets and limit access to transplantation for some patients, particularly those without adequate insurance coverage or financial resources. Should cell therapy be used in Singapore? Why (does the Positive impact outweigh the Negative Impact)? I believe that organ preservation should be used in Singapore.