What should you not do when evaluating an opponent's supporting points?A.Ignore any good argument strategiesB.Ask if the evidence is convincingC.Look for problems in the premises behind the argumentD.Consider whether the appeals are convincingSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

2. Which of the following is a critical thinking strategy that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of an argument or decision?Question 10Answera.Identifying and analyzing underlying assumptionsb.Accepting arguments without questioning themc.Relying solely on emotional appealsd.Confirming your own biases

Multiple Choice: 1 pointIdentify the type of appeal used in the following situation:A student uses credible, reliable and verifiable sources to support claims made in an argumentative essay.Group of answer choicesPathosLogosEthos

Evaluating Reasoning:

Seeking evidence to support a belief that a source is reliable while ignoring evidence that suggests otherwise*1 pointChoose This is a required questionThe ability to think, understand, and integrate ideas quickly, and then apply insights from one context to another*1 pointmental agilityMaking an irrelevant argument by criticizing the person and ignoring the evidence*1 pointChoose This is a required questionThe acknowledgment that you do not actually know everything you think you know*1 pointintellectual humilityJudging sources as unreliable regardless of evidence*1 pointChooseBeing convinced that a title or position makes someone a reliable source of information*1 pointauthority biasUnnecessary rumination or agonizing, often causing negative thoughts

Why are strong arguments convincing? a. They can be made without critical thinking. b. They offer evidence to back up their claims. c. They maintain a point of view without reasoning. d. They make others think about their thinking.