In Donoghue v Stevenson, the House of Lords held that: Select one: a. A duty of care is owed concerning the accuracy of professional advice. b. Retailers owe a duty of care to consumers in certain circumstances. c. Occupiers of premises owe a duty of care to lawful entrants in certain circumstances. d. Manufacturers owe a duty of care to consumers in certain circumstances.

Define ‘duty of care’.

To establish that a duty of care is owed to a plaintiff, in cases involving personal injury or property damage, it is necessary to demonstrate that: Select one: a. There was legal proximity between the plaintiff and the defendant. b. The defendant had control over the events that occurred. c. There was reasonable foreseeability of injury to the defendant given the relationship of the plaintiff and the defendant. d. The plaintiff was in a legally vulnerable position.

Failure to comply to a certain standard of care would result in: Direct cause Duty Breach of duty Damages

The more exacting auditor responsibility showing the evolving expectations in respect to higher standards of reasonable care was set forth in the:Select one:a.Donoghue v Stevenson case.b.London and General Bank case.c.Kingston Cotton Mills case.d.Pacific Acceptance case.

Which of these is the most accurate definition of Duty of Care?Group of answer choicesEmployers have a duty to care for their staff and stakeholdersAn employee has a duty to eliminate or mitigate any hazards in their workplaceA person is negligent unless they take precautions against a risk of harm which is foreseeable and significant and which a reasonable person would takeAn employee has a duty to eliminate or mitigate any hazards in their workplace