Consider two lotteries L1 = {200, 0.20; 400, 0.50; 500, 0.30} L2 = {500, 0.10; 300, 0.70; 100, 0.20} (a) Check for first-order stochastic dominance between these lotteries. (b) Consider an expected utility maximiser with the utility function u(x) = ln x. Which lottery is going to be preferred? What is the risk premium (RP) of the lottery L1? (c) Consider a decision maker who follows the modified expected utility approach (MEU). Assume the utility function to be u(x) = ln x and the probability weight function to be w(p) = p^0.50/{p^0.50 + (1 − p)^0.50}^2 Which lottery is going to be preferred? (d) Consider a decision maker who follows the rank dependent utility approach (RDU). Assume the utility function to be u(x) = ln x and the probability weight function to be w(p) = p^0.50/{p^0.50 + (1 − p)^0.50}^2 Which lottery is going to be preferred? note - calculate all the answers till their final values, don't leave any calculations incomplete and answer in detail
Question
Consider two lotteries L1 = {200, 0.20; 400, 0.50; 500, 0.30} L2 = {500, 0.10; 300, 0.70; 100, 0.20} (a) Check for first-order stochastic dominance between these lotteries. (b) Consider an expected utility maximiser with the utility function u(x) = ln x. Which lottery is going to be preferred? What is the risk premium (RP) of the lottery L1? (c) Consider a decision maker who follows the modified expected utility approach (MEU). Assume the utility function to be u(x) = ln x and the probability weight function to be w(p) = p^0.50/{p^0.50 + (1 − p)^0.50}^2 Which lottery is going to be preferred? (d) Consider a decision maker who follows the rank dependent utility approach (RDU). Assume the utility function to be u(x) = ln x and the probability weight function to be w(p) = p^0.50/{p^0.50 + (1 − p)^0.50}^2 Which lottery is going to be preferred? note - calculate all the answers till their final values, don't leave any calculations incomplete and answer in detail
Solution
(a) First-order stochastic dominance (FOSD) occurs when one lottery is preferred to another by all risk-averse individuals. To check for FOSD, we need to compare the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the two lotteries.
For lottery L1, the CDF is: F1(x) = 0 for x < 200 F1(x) = 0.20 for 200 ≤ x < 400 F1(x) = 0.70 for 400 ≤ x < 500 F1(x) = 1 for x ≥ 500
For lottery L2, the CDF is: F2(x) = 0 for x < 100 F2(x) = 0.20 for 100 ≤ x < 300 F2(x) = 0.90 for 300 ≤ x < 500 F2(x) = 1 for x ≥ 500
Comparing these CDFs, we see that F1(x) ≤ F2(x) for all x, so L1 first-order stochastically dominates L2.
(b) An expected utility maximiser with utility function u(x) = ln x will prefer the lottery with the higher expected utility. The expected utility of a lottery is the sum of the utilities of its outcomes, each weighted by its probability.
For lottery L1, the expected utility is: EU1 = 0.20ln(200) + 0.50ln(400) + 0.30*ln(500) = 5.298
For lottery L2, the expected utility is: EU2 = 0.10ln(500) + 0.70ln(300) + 0.20*ln(100) = 5.170
So the expected utility maximiser will prefer L1. The risk premium of L1 is the amount of money that the individual would be willing to pay to avoid the risk of the lottery. It is calculated as the difference between the expected value of the lottery and the certainty equivalent, which is the amount of money that gives the same utility as the lottery. The expected value of L1 is 0.20200 + 0.50400 + 0.30*500 = 360. The certainty equivalent is e^(EU1) = 200. Therefore, the risk premium is 360 - 200 = 160.
(c) The modified expected utility (MEU) approach takes into account the decision maker's attitudes towards probabilities. The expected utility of a lottery is the sum of the utilities of its outcomes, each weighted by a probability weight function w(p).
For lottery L1, the MEU is: MEU1 = w(0.20)*ln(200) + w(0.50)*ln(400) + w(0.30)*ln(500) = 1.386
For lottery L2, the MEU is: MEU2 = w(0.10)*ln(500) + w(0.70)*ln(300) + w(0.20)*ln(100) = 1.386
So the decision maker will be indifferent between L1 and L2 under the MEU approach.
(d) The rank dependent utility (RDU) approach is similar to the MEU approach, but it also takes into account the decision maker's attitudes towards the ranks of the outcomes. The RDU of a lottery is the sum of the utilities of its outcomes, each weighted by a rank-dependent probability weight function w(p).
For lottery L1, the RDU is: RDU1 = w(0.20)*ln(200) + w(0.50)*ln(400) + w(0.30)*ln(500) = 1.386
For lottery L2, the RDU is: RDU2 = w(0.10)*ln(500) + w(0.70)*ln(300) + w(0.20)*ln(100) = 1.386
So the decision maker will be indifferent between L1 and L2 under the RDU approach.
Similar Questions
Consider an expected utility maximiser with utility function u(w) = w^a, a > 0. Verify whether this individual always rejects the lottery {(w + 110), 0.5; (w −100), 0.5} for all wealth level. note - answer this question completely in detail, do not leave any calculations incomplete
A.1 If an individual is risk averse, then:i. He prefers any lottery to amounts of money that are certain.ii. The certainty equivalent of a lottery is higher than its expected value.X. The utility function is concave.iv. The utility function is decreasing.
Consider an individual who has the following value function: v(x) = x^1/2 for gains and v(x) = −2(|x|)^1/2 for losses. This individual is facing a lottery which consist of winning Rs. 25000 with a 25 % chance, Rs. 15000 with a 25 % chance, and losing Rs. 5000 with a 50 % chance. Suppose the probability weight function is p^2. What will be the expected utility of this lottery? What will be the value of this lottery as per the RDU approach? What will be the certainty equivalent of this lottery as per the expected theory approach? What will be the certainty equivalent of this lottery as per the RDU approach?
Consider two random variables (lotteries) ˜ω1 and ˜ω2. Let ˜ω2 be dominated by ˜ω1 in the senseof the rst-degree stochastic dominance. In class we argued that the expected utility of ˜ω2 isstrictly less than of ˜ω1, i.e. E[u(˜ω2)] − E[u(˜ω1)] < 0 for any increasing utility function u(w). Explain why expected payo of ˜ω2 is also necessarily less than of ˜ω1, i.e. whyE[˜ω2] < E[˜ω1]. Give an example showing that the reverse is not true. That is, give an example of tworandom variables, such that one random variable gives a better expected payo than theother, i.e. E[˜ω1] > E[˜ω2], but ˜ω2 is NOT rst-degree stochastically dominated by ˜ω1.2
Consider an individual who has the following value function: v ( x )=√(x /2) for gains and v ( x )=-2 √|x| for losses. This individual is facing a lottery which consist of winning Rs. 1600 with a 25% chance, Rs. 400 with a 25% chance, and winning nothing with a 50% chance. The individual counts all outcomes as losses; that is, he takes as his reference point the best possible outcome under consideration. Suppose the weight function is p^2. What will be the expected value/utility of this lottery as per the prospect theory approach? What will be the expected value/utility of this lottery as per the RDU approach? What will be the certainty equivalent of this lottery as per the prospect theory approach?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.