1 ptsGroup of answer choicesAlthough Malaria rates and print newspaper revenue are closely correlated, correlation does not imply causation. The two variables could just be related by chance.The graph shows there is no correlation between malaria rates and newspaper revenue.The graph provides evidence that decreased Malaria rates have caused a decrease in newspaper revenue.The graph provides evidence that newspapers are becoming less likely to report on Malaria.
Question
1 ptsGroup of answer choicesAlthough Malaria rates and print newspaper revenue are closely correlated, correlation does not imply causation. The two variables could just be related by chance.The graph shows there is no correlation between malaria rates and newspaper revenue.The graph provides evidence that decreased Malaria rates have caused a decrease in newspaper revenue.The graph provides evidence that newspapers are becoming less likely to report on Malaria.
Solution
Para responder a la pregunta, sigamos los siguientes pasos:
-
Identificar la afirmación correcta: La pregunta nos presenta varias afirmaciones sobre la relación entre las tasas de malaria y los ingresos de los periódicos impresos.
-
Analizar cada afirmación:
-
"Aunque las tasas de malaria y los ingresos de los periódicos impresos están estrechamente correlacionados, la correlación no implica causalidad. Las dos variables podrían estar relacionadas por casualidad."
- Esta afirmación es correcta. La correlación entre dos variables no necesariamente implica que una cause la otra; podrían estar relacionadas por otros factores o simplemente por azar.
-
"El gráfico muestra que no hay correlación entre las tasas de malaria y los ingresos de los periódicos."
- Esta afirmación contradice la premisa inicial de que hay una correlación estrecha entre las dos variables.
-
"El gráfico proporciona evidencia de que la disminución de las tasas de malaria ha causado una disminución en los ingresos de los periódicos."
- Esta afirmación sugiere causalidad, lo cual no se puede concluir solo a partir de la correlación.
-
"El gráfico proporciona evidencia de que los periódicos son cada vez menos propensos a informar sobre la malaria."
- Esta afirmación no se puede deducir directamente de la correlación entre las tasas de malaria y los ingresos de los periódicos.
-
-
Conclusión: La afirmación correcta es la primera: "Aunque las tasas de malaria y los ingresos de los periódicos impresos están estrechamente correlacionados, la correlación no implica causalidad. Las dos variables podrían estar relacionadas por casualidad."
Por lo tanto, la respuesta correcta es la primera opción.
Similar Questions
Which of the following is the best interpretation for the information in the graph?Group of answer choicesThe graph provides evidence that music recording artists are more likely to be scientists.Although the number of music recordings and scholarly articles in science publications are closely correlated, correlation does not imply causation. The two variables could just be related by chance.The graph shows there is no correlation between music recordings and science articles.The graph provides evidence that increased music recording has caused a raise in published science articles.
Which of the following is the best interpretation for the information in the graph?Group of answer choicesAlthough adult literacy and mobile phone ownership are closely correlated, correlation does not imply causation. The two variables could just be related by chance.The graph provides evidence that increased use of mobile phones has caused a raise in adult literacy.The graph provides evidence that literate adults are more likely to own a mobile phone.The graph shows there is no correlation between the use of mobile phones and adult literacy.
Correlation studies are useful in that they show causation to help us better understand how two variables relate to one another. Group of answer choicesTrue False
Which of the following is the best interpretation for the information in the graph?Group of answer choices" The graph shows there is no correlation between the use of the name ""Oscar"" and global incomes."Although the popularity of the name "Oscar" and the global incomes are closely correlated, correlation does not imply causation. The two variables could just be related by chance.The graph provides evidence that increased use of the name "Oscar" has caused a raise in global incomes.The graph provides evidence that people named "Oscar" have rising incomes
Which situation shows causation? A. When the number of hours worked each week by an hourly employee decreases, the amount of money earned by the employee also decreases. B. When the amount of a discount for a sale increases, the number of items sold during the sale decreases. C. When the number of people in a bus increases, the number of animals in a zoo also increases. D. When the number of bike trails in a city decreases, the amount of rainfall in the city increases.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.