Each week (starting in Week 3) a group of two to four students will present the material from supplementary readings that were assigned for the previous week. The aims of the presentations are to: 1) summarise and highlight important content from the readings, and 2) encourage discussion of the material in tutorials. Students will be assessed on the quality of the presentations and the facilitation of the ensuing discussion. Students will receive a marking rubric during the first tutorial, which outlines the specific criteria upon which they will be evaluated. The presentation roster will be scheduled in the first week of tutorials. Students’ presentation slides may be uploaded on Moodle.

Which of the following is not what writing tutors do during individual tutoring sessions?(select one option)Nhóm lựa chọn câu trả lờiformally evaluate the writer’s workask questions and engage in discussion with the writer about the textidentify writing problems and provide feedback to improve the textreview misunderstood or missing informationhelp writers gain a perspective on their writing

Could anything be improved with the structure of the tutorials (i.e., 2 main activities + me seeing each group)

Opinions on shared learning materials were _____ from different tutorial centres.Question 6Select one:a.interviewedb.collectedc.visitedd.surveyed

What do writing tutors need to clarify with the writer in order to provide helpful guidance during the tutoring session?(select one option)Nhóm lựa chọn câu trả lờithe purpose of the writingthe writer's target audiencethe constraints or deadlines related to the writing taskthe writer's earlier experiences with the same audience or genrefor scientific writing, if the research completed or not completedall options are correct Câu hỏi cờ: Câu hỏi 8Câu hỏi 8Tips1 điểmWhich of the following actions are important when planning to establish a new academic writing center?(select all that apply)Nhóm lựa chọn câu trả lờiidentify the needs that justify proposing to establish a new centerdetermine the goals of the future centerdetermine what types of services would best meet the identified needsdetermine what materials and equipment would be needed to provide various servicesbegin hiring staff for the future center Câu hỏi cờ: Câu hỏi 9Câu hỏi 9Tips1 điểmIt is common for academic writing centers to collaborate with the English Department or a similar unit at their institution. Such collaboration is beneficial and successful if:(select all that apply)Nhóm lựa chọn câu trả lờithe collaborators respectfully acknowledge expertise of each otherthe collaborators evaluate or second-guess any writing tasks or professors’ feedback commentswriting tutors, especially when serving students, do not get involved in the teacher-student classroom relationshipthe collaborators build on each other’s strengths

W13 ReflectionStart AssignmentDue Sunday by 9:59am Points 15 Submitting a website url or a file uploadOverviewTask: Write a well-written, professional entry in a reflective journal.Purpose: Reflect on learning.Instructor: Your instructor will grade your entry based on the rubric.InstructionsYour entry should include three paragraphs formatted as described below.Summary of the main ideas and topics of the week.A response to a specific reading, video, or activity. For instance, did something spark interest, surprise, anger, inspiration, or confusion? Reference the specific reading, video, or activity. Add your thoughts, and explain your reaction.Respond to the W13 prompt:Reflect on your future social innovation goals and the gospel.Submit your reflection to this assignment. RubricReflection Journal Rubric (11)Reflection Journal Rubric (11)Criteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent10 ptsStrongThe reflection is personal. It includes thoughtful applications and examples from this week's content. The responses to the three reflection questions are complete and thorough. There is a clear presence of reflection. This usually comes in the form of goals, questions, and applications to personal development.9 ptsVery GoodThe reflection is personal. It includes applications and examples from this week's content. The responses to the three reflection questions are complete. There is a clear presence of reflection.8 ptsGoodThe reflection includes some personal thought. Applications and examples from this week's content are included. Responses to the three reflection questions are included and each is understandable. Some reflection is evident.7 ptsAcceptableThe reflection includes some applications and examples from this week's content. The responses to the three reflection questions need more detail or thought.6 ptsPoorWriting demonstrates a shallow attempt at reflections. Examples and applications of content from this week are vague and/or absent. Responses are too short to provide substantial reflection.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryLittle to no effort is evident in the journal reflection.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollege-level writing5 ptsStrongThe writing is very clear and well organized. The reflection is logically organized into three sections, one for each question. Writing is free of grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.4.5 ptsVery GoodThe writing is clear and organized. The reflection is organized into three sections, one for each question. Writing has very few grammar, spelling, and /or punctuation errors.4 ptsGoodThe writing is organized and contains a coherent answer for each question. Writing has few grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors.3.5 ptsAcceptableThe writing could be on a higher level, but is somewhat organized and contains an understandable answer for each question. Writing has some grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation errors.3 ptsPoorWriting level is low and unprofessional. Thoughts are unclear and unorganized. The required format is not followed. Writing contains numerous grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 ptsInadequateThe writing level is very poor. The answers are difficult to understand or are not included.5 ptsTotal Points: 15